if you fail, try, try and try again

[joebloggs]

shocking story :angry:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1352647/Lying-Tanzanian-asylum-seeker-stay-2-children-HIV-alcoholic.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

and yet we have members on here who are decent and honest yet cant bring their wife to the uk :angry::cwm23:

whos paying for her legal fees :cwm23::angry:

[Terpe]

Grrrrrr!! :censored::cwm23:

[bruneicop]

this really ****** me off

[joebloggs]

the kids have a good relationship with their father :laugher:
she should be deported no matter what, using the kids to stay here :angry:

[mickcant]

Yes she should still be deported, she probibly knew what sort of man he was when she got pregnant, surprised he managed it:crazy:
Mick.:)

[Arthur Little]

:iagree: her Ladyship, the Judge's decision is frustrating to all of us whose partners came here legally. But ... on the other hand, if the woman in question had been deported, it would've been unfair - some [especially social workers! :doh] might even argue, inhumane - to expect her children to have to grow up in the UK without their mother. So I guess we have to look at things from this perspective before condemning the judicial ruling. :rolleyes:

[joebloggs]

if your wife arthur had an immigration history like this 'lady', you could hear the embassy workers :laugher: so loud, you could hear them in the uk,,
if someone is refused a spouse visa, as a small number have, the embassy would probably say to you, nothing stopping you going to live in the phils, even if you had kids, now you could try the article 8 humans rights :censored: to try and stay here, as the judge said, she had another kid here, why?, to strengthen her case..

the woman should have been deported asap, it should have not taken 15yrs for an illegal immigrant who used false papers, if it was your wife she would probably got a ban from the uk ..

how can you keep appealing, i thought they scrapped all this appealling :angry:

[Arthur Little]

:gp:s, Joe. Yes -:iagree: - in principle ... especially after reading the *thread submitted by Richard 1959 ... which I've just replied to ... ultimately leaving *it in your more than capable hands. :xxgrinning--00xx3:

[grahamw48]

I'm not going to read it. :NoNo:

[beppe]

If the mother is unfit as parent, she should be stripped of parental rights and the children given up for adoption.

It is a recurring trend for the children to follow the footsteps of the parents. If the judge is concerned for the rights of the children, she should also be concerned for their upbringing and welfare since the mother can't provide.

[grahamw48]

Even the RSPCA require a 'home-check' before one is afforded the privilege of caring for a stray dog. :rolleyes: