View Full Version : Starbucks pay no tax in the last 3 years
bigmarco
16th October 2012, 17:16
Less than 1% tax in 14 years. :cwm23:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19967397
lastlid
16th October 2012, 17:22
Yes. I saw that. WOW.
Dedworth
16th October 2012, 18:16
I'm content not to spend my money on overated, grossly overpriced and oversized cups of coffee at Starbucks, Costa Lot, Nero or any similar establishments. Wetherspoons, McD's or Greggs suits both my pocket and palate.
KeithD
16th October 2012, 18:23
I don't have a problem with what they are doing, I run a small company and my accountant does the same legal 'tricks'. I haven't paid tax since 2007, and it's all accepted by the Inland Revenue as correct and lawful.
You have to remember they are still putting over £100 million in the last few years into the economy via PAYE, pension payments, NI, etc.
lastlid
16th October 2012, 18:25
My wife tends to prefer Starbucks. There is no Starbucks on the IOM (the island has resisted them, it seems) so when we are in the UK we go for her sake, as a treat.
bigmarco
16th October 2012, 22:03
I don't have a problem with what they are doing, I run a small company and my accountant does the same legal 'tricks'. I haven't paid tax since 2007, and it's all accepted by the Inland Revenue as correct and lawful.
You have to remember they are still putting over £100 million in the last few years into the economy via PAYE, pension payments, NI, etc.
Birds of a Feather.....
Costa Coffee paid 31% tax on their Profit as opposed to starbucks less than 1%.
KeithD
17th October 2012, 09:13
Costa Coffee is a UK company, and the corporation tax is only 20% so they need to sack the accountant :doh. They would have paid below the 20% if they run the company correctly though, offsetting, leasing, etc.
Remember that a hell of a lot of companies have been running at a loss in the last 5 year period and so corporation tax is 0% anyway.
Most major UK bookmakers pay little or no tax as they have moved to Jerey or Gibraltar in the last 10 years, and a lot of other major UK companies. Vodafone paid £0 corporaton tax last year for one example, it is not unusual what Starbucks is doing, it is the norm with corporation tax. That is a problem with the way the tax works, not the companies.
Take Northern & Shell who own the like of Channel 5, OK magazine, etc, they have a number of subsidiaries that just lend money to each other to offest tax, perfectly legal.
The exact same thing happens in the US with corporation tax: http://www.businesspundit.com/25-corporations-that-pay-less-taxes-than-you-do/
raynaputi
17th October 2012, 09:48
My wife tends to prefer Starbucks. There is no Starbucks on the IOM (the island has resisted them, it seems) so when we are in the UK we go for her sake, as a treat.
I :heartshape1: Starbucks! My everyday quick fix when I was working in Makati..even the baristas of the nearest Starbucks in our office know me so well and my preference, even giving me extra servings sometimes..:biggrin: my former officemates tell me now that the baristas are always looking for me eversince I left..haha..:xxgrinning--00xx3:
lastlid
17th October 2012, 09:50
I :heartshape1: Starbucks! My everyday quick fix when I was working in Makati..even the baristas of the nearest Starbucks in our office know me so well and my preference, even giving me extra servings sometimes..:biggrin: my former officemates tell me now that the baristas are always looking for me eversince I left..haha..:xxgrinning--00xx3:
I think my wife's greatest wish is to have a Starbucks on the Isle of Man. I managed to get her a Starbucks t shirt on ebay last year. :xxgrinning--00xx3:
bigmarco
17th October 2012, 13:07
Costa Coffee is a UK company, and the corporation tax is only 20% so they need to sack the accountant :doh. They would have paid below the 20% if they run the company correctly though, offsetting, leasing, etc.
Remember that a hell of a lot of companies have been running at a loss in the last 5 year period and so corporation tax is 0% anyway.
Most major UK bookmakers pay little or no tax as they have moved to Jerey or Gibraltar in the last 10 years, and a lot of other major UK companies. Vodafone paid £0 corporaton tax last year for one example, it is not unusual what Starbucks is doing, it is the norm with corporation tax. That is a problem with the way the tax works, not the companies.
Take Northern & Shell who own the like of Channel 5, OK magazine, etc, they have a number of subsidiaries that just lend money to each other to offest tax, perfectly legal.
The exact same thing happens in the US with corporation tax: http://www.businesspundit.com/25-corporations-that-pay-less-taxes-than-you-do/
I don't disbelieve a word of it.
In a nutshell you have explained to me what I firmly believe is wrong with our society today. Austerity for the working man and Tax exemption for the fat cats.
We just look at things a different way. I was just reading yesterday that they were accessing peoples SKY bills to catch benefit fraudsters. I dont disagree with this but they say it's about £250million a year. I just thought that's probably less than what Murdoch/SKY avoid paying the tax man every year.
I understand these are the rules in place but cannot see it being right that a company has paid less than 1% on a £Billion pound over 14 years.
joebloggs
17th October 2012, 13:15
same as amazon, earlier this year as posted on this forum..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2125790/Amazon-faces-probes-paying-penny-company-tax-UK-2-years.html
lastlid
19th October 2012, 21:52
Just seen the Starbucks CEO on TV who says that they have been operating at a loss in the UK, hence the low amount of taxes paid.....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20008350
KeithD
20th October 2012, 08:40
...and that means when they do eventually make a profit they still pay no tax until they have offset all the losses.
lastlid
12th November 2012, 21:29
Starbucks. In the news again.
I can remember about 2 decades ago, my American employer making less money on paper as they found a way of dissipating their profits through inflated charges and rentals for supplies from within the company from the USA. Thus making much less profit on paper than they were really making in practice. I would guess that they paid less UK tax that way.
I see Google and Amazon are included also.
KeithD
13th November 2012, 10:32
I need to start looking at Win2Win (Ireland) Ltd :biggrin:
lastlid
18th November 2012, 19:30
Vince Cable attacks corporate 'tax abuse'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20384428
KeithD
18th November 2012, 19:49
The problem is that the present tax laws are based around bricks and mortar companies in the UK, and were never designed for the fact that around 50% of business is now done on the internet.
Either they need to rewrite the tax laws which will be very complicated, or add a 1% Sales Tax at point of sale. That would be great as it would then mean each consecutive government could increase it bt 0.5% and in the year 2100 we'll have a 20% Sales Tax :Cuckoo:
Dedworth
18th November 2012, 20:22
Looks like EU Tax Authorities are homing in on Amazon and the other slippery tax dodgers :-
But the good times may be ending. Tax authorities across Europe are investigating Amazon, and it could end up with a tax bill of up to £1 billion.
Amazon EU Sarl’s accounts say: ‘It is reasonably possible that the company will receive tax assessments from various tax authorities in the future that may or may not ultimately result in payments of additional taxes.’
Tax advisers say the statement goes well beyond what would normally appear in company documents and that it suggests the company is already facing questions from tax authorities around Europe.
http://js.dailymail.co.uk/money/markets/article-2234466/What-Amazon-didn-t-tell-MPs-Public-Accounts-Committee.html?printingPage=true
lastlid
18th November 2012, 22:20
Starbucks outperformed by lay-by sandwich van
"According to figures submitted to Companies House, Pete’s Baps, who’s base is in a lay-by just off the M4, reported greater profits than Starbucks for the third quarter of the year."
http://www.newsbiscuit.com/2012/11/18/starbucks-outperformed-by-lay-by-sandwich-van/
Arthur Little
19th November 2012, 14:21
On the subject of Tax Evasion, Panorama seemingly goes undercover tonight at 8.30 in an investigation into Corporate Service Providers :cwm25: ... the people and Companies who sell corporate anonymity and access to offshore tax havens.
Should be interesting! :wink:
Dedworth
19th November 2012, 19:53
Boris steps into the ring !
Boris Johnson: taxing mansions while Google pays nothing is 'absurd'
Boris Johnson branded Vince Cable's plans for a mansion tax 'absurd' when companies like Google are paying nothing.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9688275/Boris-Johnson-taxing-mansions-while-Google-pays-nothing-is-absurd.html
andy222
19th November 2012, 19:59
Boris has got a point. But they need to close the loopholes on these tax evaders.
lastlid
19th November 2012, 20:05
On the subject of Tax Evasion, Panorama seemingly goes undercover tonight at 8.30 in an investigation into Corporate Service Providers :cwm25: ... the people and Companies who sell corporate anonymity and access to offshore tax havens.
Should be interesting! :wink:
Thats strange as it says for tonights Panorama:
"WHO'S WATCHING THE DETECTIVES? - PANORAMA"
Presumably it is regionally different.....
lastlid
2nd December 2012, 20:13
Starbucks in talks with UK's Revenue and Customs
"Global coffee chain Starbucks has said it is in talks with HM Revenue and Customs and the Treasury over how much UK tax it pays.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20573208
bigmarco
2nd December 2012, 21:23
Have noticed a bit of an online campaign against Starbucks particularly on Facebook. Nothing like bad publicity to embarrass these greedy :censored: to get their chequebook out.
Dedworth
2nd December 2012, 21:34
Shysters
lastlid
6th December 2012, 20:09
Starbucks agrees to pay more corporation tax
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20624857
bigmarco
6th December 2012, 20:17
20 million over 2 years well that's very generous of them. They've only offered because their image has taken a bashing.
How about we don't accept their offer and instead close the loopholes they use and tax the:action-smiley-081: of them
Dedworth
6th December 2012, 20:27
What a bunch of shysters Starbucks are - just seen their UK top man (a septic) wriggling and trying to deny that they make profits in the UK when their 2011 US annual report says In particular, our Canada, Japan,UK, and China MBUs account for a significant portion of the net revenue and earnings of our international operations
See this link for the video of the guy - comes out with all the big company BS about we've listened to our customers etc
http://news.sky.com/story/1021646/starbucks-tax-row-10m-climbdown
I hope this campaign of boycotting them takes off. It won't affect me as I'm not mug enough to pay £3 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks, Costa Lot, Nero's etc
bigmarco
6th December 2012, 20:33
I hope this campaign of boycotting them takes off. It won't affect me as I'm not mug enough to pay £3 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks, Costa Lot, Nero's etc[/QUOTE]
Yep I agree Ded keep up the Boycott. Never understood the £3 a cup myself. Used them once in my life at the airport for a cup of tea. Tasted like:piss2: never spent a dime there since.
Terpe
6th December 2012, 20:53
What a bunch of shysters Starbucks are - just seen their UK top man (a septic) wriggling and trying to deny that they make profits in the UK when their 2011 US annual report says In particular, our Canada, Japan,UK, and China MBUs account for a significant portion of the net revenue and earnings of our international operations
See this link for the video of the guy - comes out with all the big company BS about we've listened to our customers etc
http://news.sky.com/story/1021646/starbucks-tax-row-10m-climbdown
I hope this campaign of boycotting them takes off. It won't affect me as I'm not mug enough to pay £3 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks, Costa Lot, Nero's etc
You're quite right Dedworth :xxgrinning--00xx3:
Actually, I will never pay that kind of money for a cup of coffee. Mine is better:icon_rolleyes:
I might pay that for a super quality beer, but that's a different proposition :icon_lol:
I would suggest that it costs only pence to produce a cup of coffee :Erm:
My dear wife talked me into having a Starbucks coffee in MOA the other week. I somehow agreed to pay and was stunned at the price :doh
Oddly, it was difficult to find a seat :Cuckoo:
lastlid
6th December 2012, 21:17
Maybe its a woman thing as my Mrs likes Starbucks and evidently so does Rayna. I agree, the prices are incredible but that appears to be the price that many outlets are charging, except for those that are selling the dishwater pishwater. (Pish is a an Aberdonian expression).
As Terpe said, its difficult to believe how they are so full. I guess we are all so different, at the end of the day.
Its a funny thing as my last employer had a Costa Coffee in its premises. People would arrive at work. Go along the corridor for a Costa Coffee and commence work. It was well patronised.
Me - I don't drink any coffee at all.
Or maybe its an age thing? We seem to get grumpier about all sorts of things when we get older.
lastlid
6th December 2012, 21:33
Now for some top coffee....$50 a cup.
http://www.lifeaftercoffee.com/2005/09/16/the-straight-poop-on-kopi-luwak-coffee/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9I5uqUwhW8
lastlid
9th December 2012, 18:00
Tax not 'voluntary', Alexander tells firms
"Danny Alexander has told multinational firms that paying tax is an obligation, not "a voluntary choice" they can make to please their customers."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20657312
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.