PDA

View Full Version : Andy Burnham wants more immigrants



Dedworth
29th August 2015, 16:53
Andy Burnham tells David Cameron to accept quotas of Calais migrants to help with his EU renegotiation

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/andy-burnham/11832643/Andy-Burnham-tells-David-Cameron-to-accept-quotas-of-Calais-migrants-to-help-with-his-EU-renegotiation.html

:crazy: Designer suited poseur

grahamw48
29th August 2015, 20:44
Yes, the country needs more and more immigrants. They are going to contribute to Britain's economy, blah blah blah blah. :yawn:

WITH NO THOUGHT given to the total destruction in the future of our traditions and , in the main, our peaceful way of life. :NoNo:

stevewool
29th August 2015, 21:08
All these people saying we want this and we should do that, well put all these people up in your house i say , then tell us all after 6 months of you doing this , is it still right to do it

Dedworth
29th August 2015, 21:12
I'd like to see the likes of slippery, hypocritical scouser Burnham have a tribe of pikeys pitch up in his front garden, get burgled by drug addicts then mugged by illegals

grahamw48
29th August 2015, 21:19
lol...too right. :xxgrinning--00xx3:

Harry T
29th August 2015, 22:20
Can none of these Politicians see that they are totally ruining, what was the British way of life, do none of them not take any notice of public opinion ?. :cwm23:

grahamw48
29th August 2015, 23:02
Nope... only interested in not rocking the Rslicking promotion boat.

Dedworth
29th August 2015, 23:21
Nope... only interested in not rocking the Rslicking promotion boat.

I voted for Red Jez and Fat Tom for deputy earlier in the Labour leadership election :biggrin:

grahamw48
30th August 2015, 00:06
...Been wondering whether your vote had been rooted out and binned yet. :icon_lol: :xxgrinning--00xx3:

Dedworth
30th August 2015, 01:06
Nah they're too stupid and standing by their crackpot system :icon_lol:

London_Manila
30th August 2015, 01:42
Burnham is just more of the same :yawn:

KeithD
30th August 2015, 09:05
I voted for Red Jez and Fat Tom for deputy earlier in the Labour leadership election :biggrin:

You are sad, childish and pathetic. I have reported your details to Labour. What you are doing is not democracy, and yet you are one of the first to complain about such things.

Dedworth
30th August 2015, 11:04
You are sad, childish and pathetic. I have reported your details to Labour. What you are doing is not democracy, and yet you are one of the first to complain about such things.

Thanks

A futile move though as plenty more will have voted the same due to their ill conceived system

KeithD
30th August 2015, 11:15
That does not make it right. Your vote will not count. :smile: Every little helps.

SimonH
30th August 2015, 11:20
I'm sure Ded didn't fill out the form with Mr Ded Worth though :Erm:

les_taxi
30th August 2015, 11:29
I'm sure Ded didn't fill out the form with Mr Ded Worth though :Erm:

:icon_lol:

raynaputi
30th August 2015, 11:33
I'm sure Ded didn't fill out the form with Mr Ded Worth though :Erm:

Keith knows his name. :xxgrinning--00xx3:

SimonH
30th August 2015, 11:46
Keith knows his name. :xxgrinning--00xx3:


That's what I was concerned about, how does Keith know his name :Erm:

KeithD
30th August 2015, 12:42
That's what I was concerned about, how does Keith know his name :Erm:

:biggrin: Friends in North Korea

Iani
30th August 2015, 14:34
Who cares, Corbyn is the most likeable charismatic candidate out of the bunch of them.........granted the bar isn't raised that high.
In the end, it wasn't the old left wing who wrecked the country recently, it was Blair. Would Corbyn have wasted British lives by taking us into Iraq under lies? Would he have bent over like Blair did?

As for Burnham, and frankly as for nearly all the left wing liberal types, they all share one thing in common - they live absolutely nowhere near areas of "diversity", nowhere near council estates, ensure THEIR kids avoid so called bog standard comprehensives.

London_Manila
30th August 2015, 15:48
Who cares, Corbyn is the most likeable charismatic candidate out of the bunch of them.........granted the bar isn't raised that high.
In the end, it wasn't the old left wing who wrecked the country recently, it was Blair. Would Corbyn have wasted British lives by taking us into Iraq under lies? Would he have bent over like Blair did?

As for Burnham, and frankly as for nearly all the left wing liberal types, they all share one thing in common - they live absolutely nowhere near areas of "diversity", nowhere near council estates, ensure THEIR kids avoid so called bog standard comprehensives.

Good point :xxgrinning--00xx3:

The repugnant Tony Blair should crawl back under his stone :NoNo:
Blair's anti Corbyn comments actually translate into a good reason to vote for Corbyn
Blair fails to understand that politics is about principles and not just about winning the next election
The right wing gutter press seem to think Corbyn is unelectable well i don't believe that for a second

Dedworth
31st August 2015, 21:36
You are sad, childish and pathetic. I have reported your details to Labour. What you are doing is not democracy, and yet you are one of the first to complain about such things.

1) So your opinion aside and back to the thread title what do you think about Burnham wanting to put the public at risk from these people ?

2) What is not democratic ? - Labour invited "supporters" to register and vote - I support non Champagne Socialists of which Mr Corbyn is a fine example :wink:

grahamw48
31st August 2015, 22:13
Labour supporters have my deepest sympathy when considering the motley crew of specimens they are being asked to choose a leader from. :NoNo:

No wonder so few, if any, bother to fly the red flag here on this forum now. Must be very hard to take ....the shame of it.

les_taxi
31st August 2015, 22:27
Labour supporters have my deepest sympathy when considering the motley crew of specimens they are being asked to choose a leader from. :NoNo:

No wonder so few, if any, bother to fly the red flag here on this forum now. Must be very hard to take ....the shame of it.
Thank god they never got into power-the public have restored my faith.
This bunch really are a shower-unelectable for many years to come:xxgrinning--00xx3:

Dedworth
31st August 2015, 22:31
Labour supporters have my deepest sympathy when considering the motley crew of specimens they are being asked to choose a leader from. :NoNo:

No wonder so few, if any, bother to fly the red flag here on this forum now. Must be very hard to take ....the shame of it.

:xxgrinning--00xx3:

Are you off tomorrow Graham? Have a good tour

grahamw48
31st August 2015, 22:36
Yes mate... thanks. 4pm bus to the train station, to the airport for my 8.25 pm flight. :xxgrinning--00xx3:

KeithD
1st September 2015, 08:34
1) So your opinion aside and back to the thread title what do you think about Burnham wanting to put the public at risk from these people ?

2) What is not democratic ? - Labour invited "supporters" to register and vote - I support non Champagne Socialists of which Mr Corbyn is a fine example :wink:

1) Well Cameron has let in over 330,000 in the last year, so what's a few more? :wink:

2) There is one person on this forum who constantly makes posts about others breaking rules and law, not playing fair, and the loss of Britishness. Yet, when it comes to the Labour vote, they suddenly become two-faced. :NoNo: It's OK for them to do things that they know is not in the spirit of being British, but it's not OK for others. :doh "Practise what you preach", is a commonly used BRITISH phrase.

Dedworth
1st September 2015, 12:35
Another deluded fool :mad:

Britain must take in 10,000 refugees, says Labour's Yvette Cooper

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11836450/Britain-must-take-in-10000-refugees-says-Labours-Yvette-Cooper.html

les_taxi
1st September 2015, 13:08
I clicked the survey and am pleased to say I'm in the 65 % who say no more.

London_Manila
1st September 2015, 17:01
Another deluded fool :mad:

Britain must take in 10,000 refugees, says Labour's Yvette Cooper

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11836450/Britain-must-take-in-10000-refugees-says-Labours-Yvette-Cooper.html

What else should we expect from Ed Balls wife

Corbyn has no opposition in my view with these 3 stooges :biggrin:

stevewool
1st September 2015, 20:02
10,000 a month she says, but does she mean every month, she would not say

les_taxi
1st September 2015, 20:21
Bet if it was pre election she would not have said that:icon_lol:

stevewool
1st September 2015, 20:36
What got me about these 10,000 that we could take in the first month, that means houses and benefits for these people,
What about the folk that are already waiting for houses and benefit and are here already, living here for years and they are English born and bred , this is what i cannot understand

KeithD
1st September 2015, 20:49
What got me about these 10,000 that we could take in the first month, that means houses and benefits for these people,
What about the folk that are already waiting for houses and benefit and are here already, living here for years and they are English born and bred , this is what i cannot understand

Plenty of park benches for the Brits to sleep on. The young are usually so drunk, they can't remember where they live anyway, so someone else may as well have their home. :biggrin:

Iani
1st September 2015, 21:09
I say let 10,000 in.............but they must be housed in Normanton

stevewool
1st September 2015, 21:37
I say let 10,000 in.............but they must be housed in Normanton

Normanton Wakefield

les_taxi
1st September 2015, 23:36
I know it:yikes: Denby dale better:xxgrinning--00xx3: