Arthur Little
31st August 2016, 13:37
www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37222674 ... :ReadIt:
:icon_sorry: ... 'fraid I disagree! For starters, "sacking" is too strong a word to use here. What I really feel should happen, is that women - whose husbands/partners are in full-time employment - ought to be able to voluntarily put their careers/jobs 'on hold' and opt to remain at home in order to give their young children the care and attention they deserve :icon_rolleyes: ... at least until those kids are old enough to attend school.
OK ... :anerikke: ... times can be tough, financially these days for the average family. But if ALL young, working women with kids were to follow the path I've suggested, it would lead to less unemployment generally ... thus stemming the tide of hardship nationwide.
Instead of penalising the later in life pension schemes of *stay at home mums, the Government should concentrate on introducing some form of compensatory payments to *encourage them to do so. :xxgrinning--00xx3:
:icon_sorry: ... 'fraid I disagree! For starters, "sacking" is too strong a word to use here. What I really feel should happen, is that women - whose husbands/partners are in full-time employment - ought to be able to voluntarily put their careers/jobs 'on hold' and opt to remain at home in order to give their young children the care and attention they deserve :icon_rolleyes: ... at least until those kids are old enough to attend school.
OK ... :anerikke: ... times can be tough, financially these days for the average family. But if ALL young, working women with kids were to follow the path I've suggested, it would lead to less unemployment generally ... thus stemming the tide of hardship nationwide.
Instead of penalising the later in life pension schemes of *stay at home mums, the Government should concentrate on introducing some form of compensatory payments to *encourage them to do so. :xxgrinning--00xx3: