Arthur Little
3rd May 2017, 14:41
Funnily enough, I've often thought that! :smile:
:yeahthat:'s certainly true in Primark's Perth store, which - for some strange reason - seems to consistently stock a plethora of X/S sizes in BOTH men's and women's clothing. :crazy:, really ... considering the vast majority of customers are taller (and broader) than they ever were.
According to the 'Journal of Eating Disorders', these display mannequins are, invariably disproportionate in size to the average male and/or female bodybuilds. Hence their "dimensions" are also deemed "medically unhealthy" - being patently far too thin when compared against a standard~sized bodyshape. :biggrin:
www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/39791805/female-shop-mannequins-are-medically-unhealthy-and-unrealistic ... :ReadIt:
:yeahthat:'s certainly true in Primark's Perth store, which - for some strange reason - seems to consistently stock a plethora of X/S sizes in BOTH men's and women's clothing. :crazy:, really ... considering the vast majority of customers are taller (and broader) than they ever were.
According to the 'Journal of Eating Disorders', these display mannequins are, invariably disproportionate in size to the average male and/or female bodybuilds. Hence their "dimensions" are also deemed "medically unhealthy" - being patently far too thin when compared against a standard~sized bodyshape. :biggrin:
www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/39791805/female-shop-mannequins-are-medically-unhealthy-and-unrealistic ... :ReadIt: