Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: US *£^*^"% Medical Ads

  1. #1
    Administrator KeithD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Denbigh, United Kingdom
    Posts
    24,038
    Rep Power
    150

    US *£^*^"% Medical Ads

    Pathetic 'oles

    One ad states about the product "Cure for arthritis", and another "Reverses arthritis".....how the do they get away with such misleading advertising?

    Major drug companies have spent $$$Billions on arthritic research over the years, and not one peer reviewed scientific papers reference the above statements.

    100% not allowed in the UK thankfully.

    ....and while I'm at it...Oprah you ......she stated that some 'berry' was anti-aging, best for antioxidants, etc.....based on what? A non-peer reviewed study of TWELVE people ....and yet on her word they've sold millions.

    However, we do have one peer reviewed scientific document on antioxidants, and it is that they are dangerous and 'may' shorten your life. Why? Because the antioxidant also destroys the 'good' oxidants in your body
    Keith - Administrator


  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    N. Wales, Wrexham
    Posts
    6,545
    Rep Power
    0
    Ample proof of Yankee gullibility.....

    Back here they'd be referred as " Being a jelly baby short of a quarter"....


  3. #3
    Trusted Member mickcant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Isle of Wight UK
    Posts
    2,953
    Rep Power
    150

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by aromulus View Post
    Ample proof of Yankee gullibility.....

    Back here they'd be referred as " Being a jelly baby short of a quarter"....
    Hi,
    I have sufferd from this for around 12 years, but I know medication prescribed by my Dr and getting exersize on my cycle are the best helpfor me.
    Mick.


  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Where she is, is home!
    Posts
    2,397
    Rep Power
    0
    To answer as an American would:

    "Hey, if it's on the TV or in black and white, it must be right, huh"

    Any answers you can offer whilst in the States must be quick 20 second soundbites as they move on to the next ludicrous assumption before you can discuss the previous one.


  5. #5
    Respected Member IainBusby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Coventry
    Posts
    2,985
    Rep Power
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by aromulus View Post
    Ample proof of Yankee gullibility
    They elected both Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush didn't they...... if that aint proof enough......


  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    N. Wales, Wrexham
    Posts
    6,545
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by IainBusby View Post
    They elected both Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush didn't they...... if that aint proof enough......
    Not content with that, they felt they had to elect "Arnie" too.....


  7. #7
    Moderator fred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    South,North East,somewhere.
    Posts
    11,464
    Rep Power
    150
    We have some really good meds on this side of the planet...I mean really useful stuff..
    Liveraid for example... A bottle of rum and a liveraid pill and your liver is like COMPLETELY SORTED till the next session.
    It must really work as Wow wow willy promotes it every day.


  8. #8
    Respected Member IainBusby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Coventry
    Posts
    2,985
    Rep Power
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by aromulus View Post
    Not content with that, they felt they had to elect "Arnie" too.....
    Yea, actually George W was the worst choice they made, the other 2 were just bad actors who used their popularity to get elected. The thing about Bush is that he was just a bad actor as well, but he got his dad (and his dad's cronies) to tell everyone he was really a politician and buy the presidency for him. But they didn't really buy it for him, they bought it for themselves so that they could start a war and make lots of money for themselves.


  9. #9
    Respected Member somebody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    In London Thank arry
    Posts
    8,162
    Rep Power
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by IainBusby View Post
    Yea, actually George W was the worst choice they made, the other 2 were just bad actors who used their popularity to get elected. The thing about Bush is that he was just a bad actor as well, but he got his dad (and his dad's cronies) to tell everyone he was really a politician and buy the presidency for him. But they didn't really buy it for him, they bought it for themselves so that they could start a war and make lots of money for themselves.

    Sadly Obama seems to be also full of good soundbites and great on TV who is suddenly going back on promises

    Hopefully im wrong but I guess only time will tell
    Oh lord why did you make so many clothes and shoe shops


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 1st October 2012, 17:09
  2. APPLICATION FORM "How to" "What to"
    By brokenpieces in forum Help & Advice
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 13th April 2012, 23:39
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 25th June 2008, 13:11

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Filipino Forum : Philippine Forum