Which is what my original post implied.
Understandable! Which, was WHY I said that I always thought that it was a daft pre-requisite to expect proof of this kind. Nonetheless, I have always been under the impression that it WAS needed.
What KIND of tentative plans?
No disrespect, but surely this *equates with your own statement earlier to the effect that "you could have the biggest wedding booked [ACTUAL plan] but it doesn't necessarily mean you are going to get married" ... *IN THAT, when YOU applied you indicated you were getting married in the UK in May [only TENTATIVE plan,] which no more proved that the wedding would ACTUALLY take place either. Indeed, by its 'tentative' nature, it's LESS of an indication that the plan was likely to be fulfilled - even though it WAS - if you catch my drift.
![]()