Quote Originally Posted by lestaxi1 View Post
You not reading my post properly,I said the sentenced was reduced to manslaughter and i said since the offence fearon has commited further crimes.
nothing to do with the original offence.
I am sorry, I did mis read as I assummed you were mentioning Fearon as it had something to do with Martin's change of conviction on appeal.

That Fearon had convictions, and has since had more, had/has no connection whatsoever with the charge against Martin nor the result of his appeal.