That's great news Fred, but you haven't actually told us what the diagnosis is ! Maybe you haven't had a chance to read my posts.Originally Posted by fred
That's great news Fred, but you haven't actually told us what the diagnosis is ! Maybe you haven't had a chance to read my posts.
Well Alan as I said he refused to have the biopsy after the doctor explained the risks of his lung collapsing or his heart being hit by the needle etc etc....His wife was not happy about his decision and he even said to her that maybe she wanted him to die earlier than he was supposed to..I certainly did not want to push the matter as if anything did go pear shaped they would probably have blamed me.. I have to respect his decision.
Anyway..He`s back in the jungle now working on my house and just getting on with things..
The doctor did say that it was probably malignant.. 85% probability..
Although it's best to have biopsy proof where ANY cancer is suspected, before treatment is started, it's not always possible especially with lung cancer, even in the best hospitals.
The remedies he is taking may not cure him, but I fully agree with you Fred in respecting his decision. He's lucky to have your support
Alan.. Its just clicked that you might actually be a doctor..I just checked your profile and that was confirmed..
We are really lucky to have you here to advise us from time to time!
We are really lucky to have you here to advise us from time to time!... We are indeed ... extremely fortunate ... thanks a million, Alan!
I've said before that I've learned a great deal from OTHER people's expert knowledge on this forum
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
