Yes Triple5 I think you have hit the nail. People have been brainwashed into 'knowing' that they really 'need' the consumer products which at one time were considered luxuries are now seen as necessities.
I remember some years ago that UK had both the highest employment but also the highest unemployment levels in Europe. Seems an impossible situation but in UK almost all married women were registered workers unlike the rest of Europe.
Well, speaking for my own mother,SHE gave up work on getting married in 1941 ... three years before I [the elder of two brothers] was born. She only decided to take (what she called) a "wee job" again in 1968 ... a few months after my wedding ... and then had to give it up in 1976 at the age of 60 - which was the statutory retiral age for women back in those days.
I have to say that my younger brother and I benefitted in a great many respects from our mother being at home for us returning from school. Oh sure, plenty other kids' *mums were out working ... even in the 1950s ... but *THEY were the ones that DID want all the "trappings" of the "good life" - for no reason other than to "keep up with the Joneses" as Triple has mentioned above. So yes, Joe - whilst I accept the "needs must"plea in SOME cases, there are many more married women (with pre-school-age children) to whom this argument does NOT apply, since the husband and father is already earning a salary that is adequately sufficient to support his wife and young family.
I feel so sorry for the kids in the programmeI'm a working mum too ( partime) but i make sure i dont overfeed or give my boys junk foods.
![]()
LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)