Fix... Fiddle ... Cover-up
If any of us had pushed over a copper and he had died, would it have taken over 12 months to think about charging use, especially as they had video evidence????
Fix... Fiddle ... Cover-up
If any of us had pushed over a copper and he had died, would it have taken over 12 months to think about charging use, especially as they had video evidence????
Keith - Administrator
The first Home Office Pathologist said the cause of death was a heart attack ; the second and third said it was internal bleedingThe Crown Prosecution Service said they would be unlikely to prosecute "successfully" because of the conflicting medical evidence. I have to say in this case I simply can't leap to the defence of these highly trained specialists. For a start, second and third postmortem examinations are technically difficult. But more importantly, the man died after being pushed over ...common sense (with no medical background) would suggest cause and effect rather than "natural causes"
perhaps being pushed over by a policeman is now considered "natural causes"
Absit invidia
DISCLAIMER: The information hereinabove may or may not be entirely accurate, relevant, forthright, verifiable, or coherent. KeithAngel, who shall herein be refered to as the 'Shining Beacon of Light', reserves the right to neither confirm, deny, justify, explain, or otherwise acknowledge any inquiry in regards to the validity, genuinity, construction, intent, and/or motive of any statements, gestures, and/or actions whether real, imagined, or transdimensional in origin. Further, the 'Shining Beacon of Light' shall be absolved of any and all legal, moral, and financial responsibilities for damages to life, limb, character, reputation, property, and/or business resulting from the usage, assimilation, incorporation, replication, and/or distribution of said statements whether partial, complete, misquoted, or imagined. This disclaimer remains in effect despite any discrepancies or claims as to its legibility, comprehension, interpretation, subliminal suggestiveness, political affiliation, legality, visibility, and/or physical presence
...strange the CPS seemed to 'forget' the 6 month limit for the charge
Keith - Administrator
i think its a tuff job being a police man these days , so differant toyears ago seeing a police man asking advice and having the respect for them too, it seems todays police when in gangs of 3 or more they become just like a bunch of thugs themselves bullies, and knowing that they have the force behind them too,
Luke ..... May the Force be with youOriginally Posted by stevewool
..... and knowing that they have the force behind them too,
Keith - Administrator
FACT - The first pathetic pathologist has been discretited over some dodgy post mortem reports.The first Home Office Pathologist said the cause of death was a heart attack ; the second and third said it was internal bleeding
About 25 years ago I investigated the death of a man who had been punched by another. The man died of a heart attack. As it happens the man who died was a very big guy, grossly over weight and unfit (rather like it would appear the man in this case) and the one who hit him much smaller. The big man died of a heart attack.
I submitted the paper to our prosecution dept and was told that as the man died of natural causes, a heart attack, we could only charge the assailant with causing actual bodily harm.
Just because it was a police officer who pushed this guy, does not change the law, albeit that possibly those more cynically minded of 'us' would like it to be different !
This is not a medical forum, and I am talking neither cynically nor as a pathologist here
The second forensic pathologist, who is well respected, described injuries sufficient to support a charge of ABH (actual bodily harm), consistent with a baton strike (whether or not there was also a heart attack). I rest my case.
Doc Alan, as I said in the case I investigated, I was instructed that in Law when a person dies of natural causes, a heart attack, this does amount to justification for a criminal charge. If however, an otherwise healthy person were subjected to such stress that they suffered a heart attack, the facts in that case might be judged to be different from the case I investigated, and this case.
I think you may agree that a person who, due to life style or general level of health, may be liable to suffer a heart attack, may do so at almost any time. If that happens to occur at a time when they are subject to any stress, it would be difficult for a pathologist to establish that the incident was the cause of the heart attack, and thus the death.
Quote: The second forensic pathologist, who is well respected, described injuries sufficient to support a charge of ABH (actual bodily harm), consistent with a baton strike (whether or not there was also a heart attack). I rest my case.
I do not know if you are in possession of all the facts regarding what actually happened 'consist with a baton strike' would also be consistent with a blow from almost any blunt instrument. To justify a criminal charge, it would be necessary to prove what actually happened, and that that amounted to a criminal offnce.
Without being in possession of all the facts. I, nor probably any legally trained person, would be tempted to explain why a charge was, or was not brought in any case.
It's a small world and I know the third pathologist in this sad case, who agrees that the cause of death was an abdominal haemorrhage (internal bleeding) which resulted from the fall to the ground as a result of the push by the police officer. At the end of the day this is two expert opinions, and experts can be wrong. Common sense in this case suggests they are right!
But this is a filipinouk forum and most members have only a passing interest in such matters so I don't intend to comment further
John.....
We keep hinting that the police ain't what it used to be, and operate anymore...
I found Ulster defence league paramilitaries in full gear and sidearms, a hell of a lot less intimidating...
Have you had a look a one on the beat lately....???
They go out loaded for bear....
No he wasn't
Keith - Administrator
What I said was , 'About 25 years ago I investigated the death of a man who had been punched by another. The man died of a heart attack. As it happens the man who died was a very big guy, grossly over weight and unfit (rather like it would appear the man in this case) and the one who hit him much smaller. The big man died of a heart attack.
In the case I investigated I too thought that the assailant should be charged with murder and maybe convicted of that or manslaughter, but as I said, the QC who reviewed the case decided that in Law, as in the Tomlinson case, there was not sufficient evidence to prove that the victim's heart attack was caused by the assault. I accepted the QC's decision. I do know of any reason why I would question the decision of, probably a QC, in the Tomlinson case. To be able to make an informed judgement (rather than 'lets just attack the police') one would need access to all the facts including the PM reports. To make any decision without that information is just a wild guess in the dark.
A warning, albeit from a non medical man, if one is over weight, smokes, has a 'drink problem' has a poor diet, has an unhealthy lifestyle and does no exercise, you are at a higher risk of a heart attack and should have a chat with your doctor. Logic, would seem to suggest, that physically fit people are less likely die if they are pushed over, fall over or face a stressful situation ( maybe like demonstrating in a riot).
A warning from another non medical man, if one is over weight and leads a bad lifestyle prone to heart attacks try not to get pushed over by policeman
i have learnt to do what my wife says!
Surely if you are that over weight you'd just wobble and not fall down
Keith - Administrator
Not getting involved in a violent, illegal, demonstration might contribute to that.A warning from another non medical man, if one is over weight and leads a bad lifestyle prone to heart attacks try not to get pushed over by policeman
It wasn't though?
Keith - Administrator
I bow to your superior knowledge (especially as I was not there and therefore cannot know first hand what happened) and I will ignore the reports on the internet which say otherwise.It wasn't though?
I understand and admire your, somewhat, at times, misguided, loyalty to your old mason's circle of colleagues, but I starting to think that the blinkers you are wearing will need to be removed sooner or later, surgically...
Please do come back for a couple of months on a fact finding tour of modern police procedures and hidden agendas...
Aromulus, I am surprised that you seem to have chosen to insult me rather than make an inteligent comment.
Despite 'stick and stones etc' for obvious reasons, I will refrain from any further comment on this thread.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/ap...police-assault This is the official accepted version. You can see in the video he's not with the protesters, and he was heard asking to get through as he was trying to get to the train station.
Keith - Administrator
Sorry if you feel offended by my tongue in cheek comment, and apologize, but you have to realize that times have changed, and so has the interpretation of the law, including justice dispensing...
It is not as you remember it anymore, please do wake up to it.
You have to make an appointment for the police to visit you now!!!
Keith - Administrator
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
