I'm a strong believer in the police using the tactic of 'Police Helicopter' and strategically placed 'Stingers' rather then engaging in a yank style police chase. It's safer to stand off and have cars waiting then to keep on chasing at ridiculous speeds down side streets.
Whilst this old guy is in the wrong, they'd have had a stronger case had they just left him to drive off, followed him carefully and arrested him when he got home.
I know I always say this but here I go again.
I know there are a lot of people who love to jump to conclusions, often based on their prejudices, especially when the police are involved. These same people will often stick to their preconceived ideas even after all the facts have been published, regardless of what the findings were. It's not logical but that's life. Some people even write books to 'prove' their theories, again often with a scattering of mistruths (lies) to support what they say. If there are enough gullible people the books sell well and the authors make a ton and are inspired to do it all again. Ludervick Kennedy was one such.
The inescapable fact is: One cannot come to any reasoned conclusion by what they read in the papers, see on TV or a video etc. That is why they investigate cases. Only when all the facts are known can one make a reasoned decision.
But, take no notice of this, continue making your guesses. By the time all the facts come out everyone will have forgotten what you said so you won't even need to say you were maybe wrong !!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
