Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Major Overhaul Of State Pensions

  1. #1
    Moderator Arthur Little's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    City of Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    24,230
    Rep Power
    150

    Major Overhaul Of State Pensions

    According to a BBC source, the UK coalition government is planning a "very radical" overhaul of the state pension - the first reform of this magnitude in over three decades - as announced by Business Secretary, Vince Cable (himself of pensionable age) on 'Breakfast Television' this morning.

    Apparently, the government is keen to "improve the lot" of older, retired people ... particularly women - many of whom, in the past, tended to lose out on account of having paid insufficient National Insurance contributions to eventually qualify for a full pension - due to earlier child-rearing commitments.

    And that's all well and good ... until we learn that these proposals are likely to "take some time to introduce!" Why? After all, successive governments have habitually been quick off the mark in implementing unpopular regimes ... such as sanctioning higher fuel costs - which affects everyone [car owners or not] in terms of soaring food prices - the net result being that the poorest families are invariably the hardest-hit. Then, of course, there's the imminent rise in VAT from 17% to 20 per cent, come January.

    Also, a Green Paper scheduled for "later this year" is aimed at providing better conditions for future pensioners. There's even (unconfirmed) rumours of the basic pension rising from £97 to £140 per week for a single person. But - given that there are only two full months left in 2010 - isn't it more likely to be the financial year (ending in April) that's being talked about here!? And what about today's pensioners? How are they expected to cope meanwhile?

    Arghh ... enough procrastinating, Mr Cable ... get properly "wired-up" ... and sooner rather than later!


  2. #2
    Respected Member tomboo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Horwich, Bolton
    Posts
    192
    Rep Power
    53
    maybe he just needs a pro castration to speed things up a little


  3. #3
    Trusted Member mickcant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Isle of Wight UK
    Posts
    2,953
    Rep Power
    150
    Hi Arthur,
    I was hopfull when I read about this in a paper this morning (better not admit it was the Sun )
    But it sounds like at 66 I will see no benifit in my lifetime
    Mick.


  4. #4
    Administrator KeithD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Denbigh, United Kingdom
    Posts
    24,054
    Rep Power
    150
    At least it's a step in the right direction.... doesn't bother me... I've been getting my pension since I was 21
    Keith - Administrator


  5. #5
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pangasinan
    Posts
    25,623
    Rep Power
    150
    So when are they going to up the retirement age for women...who have the good fortune to outlive us downtrodden men by around 6 years on average ?

    Seems that's been quietly brushed under the carpet.

    Equality of the sexes only appears to move in one direction.


  6. #6
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by grahamw48 View Post
    So when are they going to up the retirement age for women...who have the good fortune to outlive us downtrodden men by around 6 years on average ?

    Seems that's been quietly brushed under the carpet.

    Equality of the sexes only appears to move in one direction.
    probably when women get the same pay as men
    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Marikina City
    Posts
    26,785
    Rep Power
    150
    Funnily enough, my interest in State Pension increases exponentially as time goes by.

    As it currently stands, from April 6 2010, the State Pension age for women
    already started to increase.
    Originally it was to be from current 60 to be 65 by 2020.

    But...It has already been announced that some new proposals will mean women’s State Pension age will increase more quickly to 65 between April 2016 and November 2018.

    And.....from December 2018 the State Pension age for both men and women will start to increase to reach 66 by April 2020.

    I'm going to now review the new latest 'thinking', but I suspect it's not as clear-cut as we might imagine.


  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Marikina City
    Posts
    26,785
    Rep Power
    150
    I did a little research and a little 'reading between the lines' regarding the new Universal Basic State Pension.

    My take on this is that there's no doubt that the proposed new State Pension represents very good news for those women who have often been unable to build up sufficient National Insurance qualifying years under the current system.

    But... don't forget that the pension age for women will see a rather sudden increase
    to 66 in 2020 (maybe earlier). This will save money but at the same time hit a lot of women very hard. (So maybe women deserve something back anyway).

    Governments have long since said that the timetable for state pension age increases will be need to be reviewed.

    Don't expect to rule out the age increases, for all, being accelerated.

    Do expect any future increases to be much more closely linked to rises in life expectancy.

    Don't forget that stastically it still holds true that the poorer people in society do not tend to live as long as the wealthy.

    As it stands right now The current maximum state pension rate is £97.65 for singles
    and £156.15 for couples. Through various means tested payments it's possible to boost harder-up and older OAPs to £132.60 a week for singles, and £202.40 for couples.
    It has been suggested that abolishing the very high cost of administering this means-testing would off-set the costs for a new flat rate pension of £140 per week

    The new 'auto-enrolment' pension saving is set to begin from 2012.
    Chances are that any major reforms would need to start introduction before this.

    My conclusion:-

    As always the devil will be in the detail
    There's no such thing as a free lunch.


  9. #9
    Moderator Arthur Little's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    City of Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    24,230
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Terpe View Post
    I did a little research and a little 'reading between the lines' regarding the new Universal Basic State Pension.

    My conclusion:-

    As always the devil will be in the detail
    There's no such thing as a free lunch.
    Haven't really gone into the whole shebang in any detail ... but with the conclusions you've reached. Many older people - myself included - tend to ignore the "small print" when we should, in fact,


  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Marikina City
    Posts
    26,785
    Rep Power
    150
    Arthur, it's all 'political' in these uncertain economical times. Good news, bad news.
    For sure there must be pension changes. When you consider all the changes that are now already fixed then £140 flat rate is not such a big financial issue.
    Anyways, at 66 years young you are already there!!

    By the way, and Off Topic.
    I looked also at free bus passes. Only because I am getting close.
    Or so I thought........... But according to the rules I cannot apply until September 2011
    Complicated eligibility.... dependent upon pension age of women??
    I will be 60 in December but unable to claim then.
    Not that it's important.... At the moment.

    Be happy, Don't worry.


  11. #11
    Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spain since 1988. My wife has been here since June 2006
    Posts
    2,384
    Rep Power
    101
    I made some enquiries about a year ago to see what income my wife could expect from the UK Gov when I die.

    As she is 32 years younger than me, she does not work, she will in effect get a lump sum of almost northing and then nothing more, ever. There is no widows pension any more.

    At present we live in Spain and as my dependant she gets full national health cover. That will continue for just ONE YEAR after I die, and then NOTHING.

    I don't know how a couple living in UK will fair but I think it would be the same.


  12. #12
    Moderator Arthur Little's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    City of Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    24,230
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by johncar54 View Post
    There is no widows pension any more.
    ... isn't there anything to replace it?

    Quote Originally Posted by johncar54 View Post
    don't know how a couple living in UK will fair
    Nor do I ... in the light of what you've just said! Up until now, it hasn't really concerned me, since I was only 47 when my first wife died. That was back in 1991, of course ... and I imagine the 'Widow's Pension' was still payable then. Makes me wonder how my second wife [whom I married in 2008] will fare on my death, as - God willing (and my own health permitting) - she'll be a naturalised British Citizen before that!


  13. #13
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Marikina City
    Posts
    26,785
    Rep Power
    150
    johncar54,
    With govt state pension I believe all benefits 'die' with you.
    With private pensions it's a lttle different. I have two private pensions. One states a loss of benefit amounting to 1.8% per year for each year my wife is over 10 years younger than me . The other states a widows pension of 80% of main pension.
    Both index linked.
    I have no idea about NHS cover outside of UK. I'd better check that


  14. #14
    Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spain since 1988. My wife has been here since June 2006
    Posts
    2,384
    Rep Power
    101
    My private pension will pay about £50 a week, which I hope is indexed linked, even through it is so little.


  15. #15
    Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Near Liverpool
    Posts
    1,136
    Rep Power
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by Terpe View Post
    I did a little research and a little 'reading between the lines' regarding the new Universal Basic State Pension.

    My take on this is that there's no doubt that the proposed new State Pension represents very good news for those women who have often been unable to build up sufficient National Insurance qualifying years under the current system.

    But... don't forget that the pension age for women will see a rather sudden increase
    to 66 in 2020 (maybe earlier). This will save money but at the same time hit a lot of women very hard. (So maybe women deserve something back anyway).

    Governments have long since said that the timetable for state pension age increases will be need to be reviewed.

    Don't expect to rule out the age increases, for all, being accelerated.

    Do expect any future increases to be much more closely linked to rises in life expectancy.

    Don't forget that stastically it still holds true that the poorer people in society do not tend to live as long as the wealthy.

    As it stands right now The current maximum state pension rate is £97.65 for singles
    and £156.15 for couples. Through various means tested payments it's possible to boost harder-up and older OAPs to £132.60 a week for singles, and £202.40 for couples.
    It has been suggested that abolishing the very high cost of administering this means-testing would off-set the costs for a new flat rate pension of £140 per week

    The new 'auto-enrolment' pension saving is set to begin from 2012.
    Chances are that any major reforms would need to start introduction before this.

    My conclusion:-

    As always the devil will be in the detail
    There's no such thing as a free lunch.
    I have no idea how this is going to be implemented but think about it, if you thought you were eligible to retire aged 60 and suddenly it's age 66 that just cost you 30,000 pounds in your life, i.e. unpaid pension, equalization is a massive penalty for women!

    Yes women live longer but they also pay more in general by having to look after the kids when they are younger, early retirement is some compensation for that and is now being taken away from them.

    Yes they live longer but whose fault is that?

    They probably get better exercise than we do looking after the kids Good on them and they should still get to retire early.

    PS

    My sister retires on Friday good on her!


  16. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Marikina City
    Posts
    26,785
    Rep Power
    150
    JimOttley
    It's a 'cost-down' driven strategy not a pension improvement strategy.
    Spin will be focused on the perceived attractions.

    Glad to hear your sister is already there.


  17. #17
    Moderator Arthur Little's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    City of Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    24,230
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by JimOttley View Post

    Good on them and they should still get to retire early.
    Jim, ... women who've devoted their earlier years to caring full-time for their children deserve a much better deal than they're getting now!

    Quote Originally Posted by JimOttley View Post
    My sister retires on Friday good on her!
    All the best to her for a long and happy retirement ... I'm sure she's more than earned it!


  18. #18
    Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spain since 1988. My wife has been here since June 2006
    Posts
    2,384
    Rep Power
    101
    Can't see what all the fuss is about, 66, what 's wrong with that ?

    (Ops!!! I retired at 48 !!!! )


    On a more serious note. If people retire at a later age then unemployment levels rise.

    Although, I could never understand why police officers were encouraged to retire when they had done 30 years. (encouraged in that they could not draw their pension and stay on). Seemed ridiculous that when they may have been at their best, from a knowledge point of view, that they were not encouraged to stay on, albeit in a non operational role. A lot of my work in my later years was supervising and monitoring paperwork. I could have stayed on for years doing that and have released operational officers to spend more time on the streets doing their primary job, serving the public and preventing crime.


  19. #19
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pangasinan
    Posts
    25,623
    Rep Power
    150
    Hopefully that will have changed now..'ageism'.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. pensions
    By stevewool in forum Loose Talk, Chat and Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 2nd April 2012, 08:39
  2. Pensions
    By andy222 in forum Loose Talk, Chat and Off Topic
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 28th March 2012, 06:06
  3. Government outlines overhaul of student visas
    By joebloggs in forum UK Immigration
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23rd March 2011, 12:02
  4. Uncapped trio in England overhaul
    By Win2Win in forum Sport
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 8th August 2010, 01:01
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30th April 2010, 15:24

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Filipino Forum : Philippine Forum