Unfortunately I believe that people sometimes fail to see the problem.
In this case I suggest that it is not the fact the driver was not deported but that the punishment he was given was insufficient.
That he was disqualified is not a factor. It was the way in which he as his driving which killed a person. In saying this, I mean had he not been disqualified the crime of driving in way which resulted in the death, would have been the same.
What was required in this case was a sentence, which was adequate for the crime committed, and which hopefully would act as a deterrent to others, and that is a good argument why probably all sentences should be increased, but it is a different argument from what this thread relates to.
It may be that people believe it would have been a reasonable punishment for the driver, his wife and his children to have been punished, because that is what people here are in effect saying when they argue that the driver should have been deported. However, if that is so, how should the courts deal with say an indigenous Englishman who kills by dangerous driving?
