Hi All, An update on my situation, I have been making enquiries, and one issue keeps cropping up.
Quote ( However as your partner is moving from outside of the EU, she could be seen as an indirect recipient of public funds )
Hence the reason I made my post, prohibited ?
While none actually say' I am not allowed, they do actual say i am allowed, to have my partner/future wife join me, they do however imply that it may or will impact my situation.
I suppose it does depend on how you define, indirect recipient of public funds
In my humble opinion, I would have to say, she would be an indirect recipient of public funds, in some form or another, even tho I would not make any claims for benefits for her, and she would not make any claims either.
I am still waiting for some correspondence, to try and clarify matters.
I will update if and when that happens.
I can not change my circumstances, and after communicating with the different agencies, I now believe i will be indirectly prohibited and discriminated against, because my partner is from outside of the EU.
I plan to go to PH in May, and we intend to marry in early June, and we will continue trying, to be together in the future.
Many thanks for the advise regarding Yahoo Im chat logs, I have to say I am amazed they are accepted
because Yahoo is third party software and controlled by windows, they can be backdated to when time began, Which in reality makes them virtualy useless
unless they have all the actual chat text from each and every IM submitted as well, and even that can be manufactured.
Embassy still never replied, they did for CNI info, but avoid my first enquiry.
Regards
