Collatoral damage no doubt
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13251570
Murderous bloody thirsty !!! Ashamed to be British on days like these
Collatoral damage no doubt
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13251570
Murderous bloody thirsty !!! Ashamed to be British on days like these
We don't even know if it's true but if it is, good ridance to them all. Gaddafi new the chances of his family being hit, and failed to protect them. He new the potential consequences for killing civilian men, women, and children by the 100's in Misratah, it was his choice, and that makes him responsible for any deaths to his own family not Britain, Nato or the UN.
I'm proud to be British when we are taking action against murderous scumbags like him and his family.
Keith - Administrator
Nonsense, no child deserves to be murdered, whoever their parents are.
So What about baby adolf then?
No way of knowing how any child will turn out.
What a lot of these lunatics like Gaddafi,Saddam Hussein do is use schools,hospitals as weapons stores,communications outlets etc.
They use the kids as "human shields" in an attempt to brandish the west as murder'ers saying look you have killed all these children on purpose-bullshit!
Only on sky news yesterday one of the buildings was clearly a communications building albeit a makeshift one,its had all sorts of tech gear on it and the woman being pressed by the news reporter was papping herself and saying its a mobile phone dish
In the 2nd world war we eveacuated all the kids in London to keep them safe-in Libya,Iraq they do the opposite to gain sypathy from the rest of the world to portray us as child mudere'ers.
He is a madman and think how many innocent children he would have been happy to wipe out if he had beeen allowed to attack Bengazi!
And what's all this got to do with us Haven't we got enough problems of our own? We always end up making things worse anyway -
http://www.thenational.ae/news/world...s-into-tunisia
Wasn't a million plus deaths in Iraq enough
And our humanitarian efforts still lives on there in the form of severe birth defects...
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Wor...00908415371946
And we think we're making the world a better place
I understand those who feel the sad loss of innocent children is cruel but sometimes it's unavoidable to protect the innocent children and others from violent conflicts caused by bad governmental regimes.
I am hurt that these children died but as Win2Win stated Gaddafi could have prevented their deaths by insuring their safety by either moving them to a non-conflict area (not a command/control centre) or by giving himself up (so to speak). I believe he was using his own family to help protect himself - which has been done before...
My opinion only
im just hoping that Gaddaffi can now realize how sad and hurt to lost with loveones.....Im agree with win2win and philphil16..but sorry guys dunno how to give rep...power
Also shows what a bad shot our guys are Gaddaffi was in the same building apparently, but they managed to hit smaller targets bit like when they accidentally blew up the rebels they were supposed to be helping.
http://theswash.com/2011/04/02/nato-...bels-injure-7/
And didn't they say they had no plans to assasinate him, only wanted regime change
Good article here on the hypocrisy of this war:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_850418.html
How hard do you think it is to take one guy out who is well protected and uses children as human shields?
We could have just dropped a huge bomb on his compound and he would be gone-but so would lots of others
So what do you want us to do leave libya and watch him massacre all the rebals and civilians who don't agree with him?
Maybe thats the best way let all the countries with dictators do what they wish.
On a local level when I see some bloke giving his girlfriend a slap I will drive on shall I? Nothing to do with me
its always sad when innocent people are killed, but war is war , instead off saying i hate this and hate that , just pray for the little dears and always be proud of who you are always
Why are we trying to take him out after we were told that wasn't the plan
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/...ow/7792297.cms
You obviously have no problem with being lied to by your leaders
A least the Russians know it's illegal.
http://www.coastaldigest.com/index.p...=view&id=23985
The answer is "Yes". As I said, why can't we just concentrate on our own problems at home It's the lies and hypocrisy that grate me
Gaddafi had been cherished by Western powers more than anyone could imagine. Consider that last month the Libyan ruler was supposed to be tried in an international court for war crimes in Sierra Leone, where he "was ultimately responsible for the mutilation, maiming and/or murder of 1.2 million people." However, the U.S., U.K. and a host of other allies mysteriously intervened to protect Gaddafi, blocking the indictment. When asked why, chief prosecutor David Crane responded: "Welcome to the world of oil."
Do you honestly believe this about our sympathy for the Libyan people?
I love the russians moaning after their failed attempt to take over Afghanistan-putin has short memory.
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~cckarpov/w...adedafghan.htm
Now if only we could had stepped in and taken out Hitler 70 million would still be alive today!
I don't want any wars but we dont live in the world of fairy tales so i'm afraid since time began we will always have conflics.
We make mistakes and always will because we are human.
We can let people get on with it and massacre their people or try to intervene.
I thought our social development had moved on.
Anyway sorry to leave this discussion for now but aresenal v Man utd beckons
The rebels they hit was because the rebels didn't tell NATO they had tanks, their responsibility 100%, and they accepted that, so your point is useless.
At 35,000ft it is difficult to look through the window of a building to see which room the bad guy is in... Special Forces will just light up the building.
As for assasination, look up the meaning of the word. NATO & the UN agreed to take out all command and control, and Gadaffi and his sons control the armed forces and militia so they are fair game to be taken out of the command structure. That is not assasinating someone.
Keith - Administrator
The problem here is that the killing of his family and some children will bring him support from his own and will inspire the faint-hearted supporters (Turkey, Germany, some Arab countries etc) to withdraw their support for NATO. They will not think of the many children who are being killed and maimed by Gaddafi's forces.
What happened to, "We're only enforcing a no fly zone" Your point about the CIA backed rebels.... if the BBC knew they had tanks three weeks before why didn't NATO forces know
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12769993
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13004297
I'm pretty sure that the BBC had the GPS coordinates of tanks on support vehicles being taken along the main road along with the retreating pro-Gadaffi supporters.
Very few get killed in friendly fire incidents these days, and it will always happen in war. 1000's were killed in FF during Vietnam, 5 figures in WW1 & WW2
Keith - Administrator
"friendly fire" who make up these phrases? Nothing friendly about killing one of your own.
Why not just call it what it is? Dropping a major boock
Who adds the tags here? I like the way, "illegal, kids, killing" all go together
Erm.... welll 'Friend or Foe" guess which one associates with the phrase 'friendly fire' .... plus, you are being shot by your 'friends' not your enemies
Keith - Administrator
Just a daft phrase designed to take the brutality out of the act.
The phrase was invented by the USA when they killed their own and British soldiers
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)