3 innocent children killed in so called humanitarian effort

[Walaytawo]

Also shows what a bad shot our guys are Gaddaffi was in the same building apparently, but they managed to hit smaller targets bit like when they accidentally blew up the rebels they were supposed to be helping.

http://theswash.com/2011/04/02/nato-...bels-injure-7/

And didn't they say they had no plans to assasinate him, only wanted regime change

Good article here on the hypocrisy of this war:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_850418.html

[les_taxi]

Also shows what a bad shot our guys are Gaddaffi was in the same building apparently, but they managed to hit smaller targets bit like when they accidentally blew up the rebels they were supposed to be helping.

http://theswash.com/2011/04/02/nato-...bels-injure-7/

And didn't they say they had no plans to assasinate him, only wanted regime change

Good article here on the hypocrisy of this war:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_850418.html

How hard do you think it is to take one guy out who is well protected and uses children as human shields?
We could have just dropped a huge bomb on his compound and he would be gone-but so would lots of others

So what do you want us to do leave libya and watch him massacre all the rebals and civilians who don't agree with him?
Maybe thats the best way let all the countries with dictators do what they wish.
On a local level when I see some bloke giving his girlfriend a slap I will drive on shall I? Nothing to do with me

[KeithD]

Also shows what a bad shot our guys are Gaddaffi was in the same building apparently, but they managed to hit smaller targets bit like when they accidentally blew up the rebels they were supposed to be helping.

http://theswash.com/2011/04/02/nato-...bels-injure-7/

And didn't they say they had no plans to assasinate him, only wanted regime change

Good article here on the hypocrisy of this war:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_850418.html

The rebels they hit was because the rebels didn't tell NATO they had tanks, their responsibility 100%, and they accepted that, so your point is useless.

At 35,000ft it is difficult to look through the window of a building to see which room the bad guy is in... Special Forces will just light up the building.

As for assasination, look up the meaning of the word. NATO & the UN agreed to take out all command and control, and Gadaffi and his sons control the armed forces and militia so they are fair game to be taken out of the command structure. That is not assasinating someone.

[Walaytawo]

The rebels they hit was because the rebels didn't tell NATO they had tanks, their responsibility 100%, and they accepted that, so your point is useless.

At 35,000ft it is difficult to look through the window of a building to see which room the bad guy is in... Special Forces will just light up the building.

As for assasination, look up the meaning of the word. NATO & the UN agreed to take out all command and control, and Gadaffi and his sons control the armed forces and militia so they are fair game to be taken out of the command structure. That is not assasinating someone.

What happened to, "We're only enforcing a no fly zone" Your point about the CIA backed rebels.... if the BBC knew they had tanks three weeks before why didn't NATO forces know

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12769993
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13004297

[KeithD]

What happened to, "We're only enforcing a no fly zone" Your point about the CIA backed rebels.... if the BBC knew they had tanks three weeks before why didn't NATO forces know

I'm pretty sure that the BBC had the GPS coordinates of tanks on support vehicles being taken along the main road along with the retreating pro-Gadaffi supporters.

Very few get killed in friendly fire incidents these days, and it will always happen in war. 1000's were killed in FF during Vietnam, 5 figures in WW1 & WW2

[Walaytawo]

Who adds the tags here? I like the way, "illegal, kids, killing" all go together