Next he'll be popping up everywhere...
.
Attachment 5188
Next he'll be popping up everywhere...
.
Attachment 5188
So where do we go to get our info? Who do we believe? BBC telling us only a few years ago, "There is no Al Queda" and now they're very real again But to question what ones fed must make one an oddball or a fantastist
Always amazes that even when people are presented with the raw facts, even when the mainstream media trip up on their own lies time after time, and show their blatant lazy journalism (think recent dead OBL pics), people still refuse to question the info they're being fed.
Often, when proved wrong people will just then ignore it, and resort to more important things going on in the world.
Riveting for some I'm sure - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...cil-dress.html
Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and Senior Policy Planner under Secretaries Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, George Schultz and James Baker, is also an oddball and fantasist
Al Qaeda did stop functioning as a controlling unit years ago so the BBC is right in that. However it still existed as a cause not a physical unit, and still does, although in rcent months it has been severely brought down by the people's reactions in the Middle East.
When checking things on the internet you need to cross-reference the information with multiple reliable sources. IE. The US FBI website has Bin Laden as deceased. The Al Qaeda website has him as dead. The main witness, his wife, has reported him being shot in the head in front of her, information from numerous relaible sources. Al Jazeera, and other respected Arabic channels, including Iranian, have declared him dead..... so basically... he's dead from bullets to the head the other night. It's as simple as that.
I suggest when looking for medical information on the internet, you cross-reference the information the same way.
Those muppets on here who believe the crap from the 'odd' blog are the ones who will search for headaches, and find on a blog that they need to cut off their head to cure it
Keith - Administrator
Pity that loose cannon "The shark" got himself banned,this would have sparked off a healthy debate
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...sy-London.html
Sometimes you're flush and sometimes you're bust, and when you're up, it's never as good as it seems, and when you're down, you never think you'll be up again. But life goes on.
The beauty of a woman is not in the clothes she wears, the figure that she carries, or the way she combs her hair. The beauty of a woman is seen in her eyes, because that is the doorway to her heart, the place where love resides. True beauty in a woman is reflected in her soul. It's the passion that she shows to the outside world.
I wish the BBC would just give us the NEWS and not their VIEWS/PROPAGANDA.
I am not interested in their biased opinions and meddling.
I am tired of hearing their moaning P.C. claptrap about all the hard done by criminal scrotes, trouble-making religious minorities, sexual deviants and other assorted misfits.
...And to think that I'm expected to help fund this bunch of anti-British parasites.
The other week on the Beeb while women and children were being slaughtered in Misratah, their headline was 'A new Dr Series'
Keith - Administrator
It's a pity that none of these "sources" can get their story straight. The most laughable one has to be the picture of Obama, Hilary and co sitting around watching it live on a feed, it then turns out there was a blackout at the bogeyman's compound
If questioning a source which has been proven to lie and manipulate many times, I'm happy to be called a muppet
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-compound.html
More inconsistencies here...
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...story-crumbles
Just because its on Al Jazeera or another Arabic news station doesn't make it true. All news corps get their info from press releases, if they see its gone up elsewhere they'll just go with story.
Feel free to pick through the bones of the CIA - AL Qaeda relationship
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA-Osa...en_controversy
Jeez .... you have no idea how to get to the facts of something do you? You keep proving you don't over and over again, and just keep showing you're more stupid each time you try
Keith - Administrator
Do you want to expand or just resort to name calling? The facts (and questions which deserved to be asked) are there in the links I posted, which you've obviously not taken the time to look at
So according to you we should ignore the Telegraph and get our news from Al Jazeera for the truth Or the Daily mail perhaps
Does it really matter when he died? It's widely aknowledged that he is dead and good riddance to him.
There have been and always will be conspiracy theories - Roswell, Elvis, Princess Dianna, The Twin Towers, Al Quaeda and now Bin Laden.
Why do people get so hung up about them and argue? Whatever the truth, we're never going to know everything, and does it even matter? I've got more important things to worry/care about than whether Elvis lives on a double decker bus with Hitler on the moon or if Bin Laden was shot last week or last year It's not important when he died, my sympathy lies with the 3000 or so innocent people in New York who were murdered by terrorists inspired by his warped Jihad
Exactly.
that has never happened in 8000 or so years of so called civilized life, and it isn't about to happen any time soon. We can protest and complain about it as much as we like, but nothing will change. I really don't care about it any more, as long as my family I can live our lives in peace, safety and relative prosperity, that is far more important than whether the secret service tell the truth. Whatever we say about our Governments, I'd rather live in the UK than 95% of the other countries in the world.
No one is name calling, you are just proving your ignorance again and again. I'm not the only one who thinks that, read the other members comments throughout the thread. I'm just informing you that you're making yourself look stupid with each post concerning this subject rather than accepting the facts that are staring you in the face.
...and you are quoting sites without cross-referencing which leads to a scenario that can make people look stupid .... as I said, and you ignored the advice by posting links, you cross-reference from multiple independant trustworthy sites... it is that simple
Keith - Administrator
Walaytawo don't take this the wrong way but I don't know what you are trying to prove
Every post you make just seems to link to some silly link or video which half the time is bullshit
I talk plenty of rubbish but maybe you should move on and maybe choose some other subject-this is getting monotonous
We love a good bit of banter on here and we can be controversial too-we are not boring that's for sure.
You are a newish member and if I'm being honest wonder if you were here under another name recently
If I am wrong on that I apologize but I'm wondering if a couple of new members are ex members on a wind up mission
It seems der a lot of hosstility on dis subject. Things are realy heated hear.
lets keep this to healthy discussions, without aiming at any one in particular. each individual is only expressing his or her views. be it links or reports from tabloids.. if some find it monotonous then move on to other things.. to me any input is worth a read..
in this hear thread.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)