Quote Originally Posted by Win2Win View Post
No one is name calling, you are just proving your ignorance again and again. I'm not the only one who thinks that, read the other members comments throughout the thread. I'm just informing you that you're making yourself look stupid with each post concerning this subject rather than accepting the facts that are staring you in the face.

...and you are quoting sites without cross-referencing which leads to a scenario that can make people look stupid .... as I said, and you ignored the advice by posting links, you cross-reference from multiple independant trustworthy sites... it is that simple
My apologies if I'm winding members up with my views. I really seem to have got under the skin of yourself and a few others, never my intention, just debating.

If you can point out the sources where I should be cross-referencing I'll be happy to do so. I posted a link from the Telegraph story as it was mainstream (as most seem to accept that as solid fact). They also seem skeptical of the story the White House was giving

I'm not sure what these facts are that are staring in me face Out of the videos and links I've posted here nobody has come up with a counter argument towards them. These are top level officials saying bin Laden died years ago, the BBC saying there is no Al Qaeda, the inconsistencies of the White House story (and what look like lies), the fact bin Laden was originally supported by the CIA, I could go on, but if people don't want to question these FACTS I'll not repeat myself trying to persuade them to do so.

Peace