If the U.S weren't behind 9/11 then why did they try to rescue Osama bin Laden?
If the U.S weren't behind 9/11 then why did they try to rescue Osama bin Laden?
I'd hate the US come to rescue me
Keith - Administrator
I wish someone, anyone, would rescue me
I'm not sure what you mean by that question, Dedworth. Seems rather vague
Maybe you mean the rescuing of his family after 9/11:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/...in313048.shtml
Did you get permission to post this first anyway? It's apparently a subject which nobody is interested in around here, hence why the original OBL thread was closed.
Closed with a resounding "Osama bin Laden is dead. Period" Which, of course, nobody was refuting, only the year he died.
Call it a "conspiracy theory" but it's obvious Eddie admin was fighting a losing battle so he quickly nudged one of his mods to close the thread once he'd had the last word. Here's a guy who lectures on the importance of cross referencing, yet can't even get his numbers right on how many Brits visit the Philippines each yearI would've thought that'd be his strong suit
What happened here is quite common in these situations. You present the true facts to somebody who is brainwashed and they will deny it. When their arguments become useless they just claim boredom with the subject. "More important things to worry about," is a common answer.
The US has a long history of concotting nonsense miltary tales. Look into the stories of Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch, the toppling of the Saddam statue. These Hollywood-like staged stories are facts, not "conspiracies".
And if you ever think our military efforts abroad are justified remember that the military industrial complex is a mighty beast that needs to be fed. It's a huge part of the economy, so it needs to keep turning over. Dropping bombs keeps folks in jobs, so we have these staged wars to keep the wheels turning. Some of the comments I've read on here seem to be in favor of mass genocide anyway, quite sick really
Anyways, I would love to stay and debate with you Dedworth, and it's been a pleasure to meet others here who dare to question media and government lies, but I'm going to jump before I'm pushed. It's been made quite clear to me that this forum is only for people who are interested in taking their wives to the UK, not a place to talk about such strong emotive subjects.
Peace all
ive waited 3 hours for such a wonderful response.... well worth the wait and the superb reply ....Originally Posted by Walaytawo
I'm not sure what you mean by that question, Dedworth. Seems rather vague
Maybe you mean the rescuing of his family after 9/11:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/...in313048.shtml
Did you get permission to post this first anyway? It's apparently a subject which nobody is interested in around here, hence why the original OBL thread was closed.
Closed with a resounding "Osama bin Laden is dead. Period" Which, of course, nobody was refuting, only the year he died.
Call it a "conspiracy theory" but it's obvious Eddie admin was fighting a losing battle so he quickly nudged one of his mods to close the thread once he'd had the last word. Here's a guy who lectures on the importance of cross referencing, yet can't even get his numbers right on how many Brits visit the Philippines each year
What happened here is quite common in these situations. You present the true facts to somebody who is brainwashed and they will deny it. When their arguments become useless they just claim boredom with the subject. "More important things to worry about," is a common answer.
The US has a long history of concotting nonsense miltary tales. Look into the stories of Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch, the toppling of the Saddam statue. These Hollywood-like staged stories are facts, not "conspiracies".
And if you ever think our military efforts abroad are justified remember that the military industrial complex is a mighty beast that needs to be fed. It's a huge part of the economy, so it needs to keep turning over. Dropping bombs keeps folks in jobs, so we have these staged wars to keep the wheels turning. Some of the comments I've read on here seem to be in favor of mass genocide anyway, quite sick really
Anyways, I would love to stay and debate with you Dedworth, and it's been a pleasure to meet others here who dare to question media and government lies, but I'm going to jump before I'm pushed. It's been made quite clear to me that this forum is only for people who are interested in taking their wives to the UK, not a place to talk about such strong emotive subjects.
Peace all
who's eddie? no one in the admin and mods named eddie..
I dont really understand whats going on here, Mr Deadworth who insulted my wife here yesterday started this thread , you Admin also took him to task and neither that thread nor this are conected to imigration??
Am I missing something here?
I think you'll find the Mods are old enough to manage their own lives and decide what they do or do not do without the help of another adult. I think you may be confusing this forum with the mentally ill one you frequentCall it a "conspiracy theory" but it's obvious Eddie admin was fighting a losing battle so he quickly nudged one of his mods to close the thread once he'd had the last word. Here's a guy who lectures on the importance of cross referencing, yet can't even get his numbers right on how many Brits visit the Philippines each year
...and you don't make mistakes.... at least I admitted mine, it was an honest cut'n'paste error. You have proved over an over to all members on here how dumb you are with your views
, I imagine the other thread was closed to stop you making yourself look an even bigger idiot than you already have
Keith - Administrator
Yes... the same as Walaytwo & Branno.... this is the HUMOUR section ... you know... some peopleat things, but some folk are miserable & grumpy like Gordon Brown
Keith - Administrator
''Don't be serious..Be Sincere''
A forum full of grumpy old men is bound to be a literary bloodbath.
yes but some grumpy old men are so funny too, me included i hope, some people are born just to piss people off its there nature some are born great too, but again each to there own , beleive in what you beleive in and try to keep it to yourself and if you cant well be prepared to accept other opiniuns too, i must admit i am so out of it , dont read papers unless they are a few days old , tv news i watch what i am intrested in and so on , yes there are some bad news storys that upset one another but i am afraid if it dont concern me or my friends i am not that bothered really,this is for you walaytwo, if as you say this site is only for us men to get our wives over , well i am so glad it is then , but instead of looking everwhere try looking next to you and see our happy our lives are , this site has truely brought me happiness and some great new friends and i do call them friends too,
JUst scratch the surface and there's allways something underneath, You just have to dig out the facts and use common sence and ask questions.....or do waht most people do and just read the papers and belive all the propaganda that they force feed you and remain ignorant....ahh.....sweet bliss
Yes, I can spell, Just can't tpye
Quite right - You don't really understand whats going on here. Yesterday I started a thread highlighting a newspaper article/ photo about a girl and her mother whose bodies had some large tattoos on them which they were flaunting on a beach. In that opening post I included two popular slang names for tattoos.
5 posts down you arrived and said
I then responded
"Art for arts sake. I suppose I can't see much wrong in a small and discrete tat which is a world away from these "designs" that cover acres of flesh.
If you tire of a painting it is easy to take it off the wall. "
I can't find an insult aimed at your wife so yes you are missing something here.
You are, however, 100% correct that neither thread is connected in any way to immigration.
I didn't see any insult either
Keith - Administrator
Interested ... YES... but mainly from a newsworthy angle;
Closed by ME ... acting on my own volition - contrary to your suggestion [which I've highlighted ] below - since the thread was clearly leading nowhere,and (more to the point!) rapidly getting "up the noses"
of others.
Moderators - as in ANY forum - are appointed to carry out function(s) the title implies ... to moderate! Accordingly, we/they are fully empowered to use initiative in monitoring all material posted ... "weeding out" or editing content likely to offendand/or cause *annoyance
- either to an individual, or to the membership in general. Based on the *latter factor, therefore, Ialone, decided to shut down the thread concerned. And I stand firm on MY decision to do so!
Incidentally, James ... there is no-one here called "Eddie"!For MY part, I'm somewhat perplexed
by the fact that you've metamorphosed in your current form. You were a fairly prolific poster, writing with aplomb - albeit, managing to ruffle a few feathers in the process - before suddenly disappearing from the scene, last August. But you weren't banned. So WHY the change?
Another crank/nuisance poster Arthur - smoke 'em out
Hmm ... wellAnother crank/nuisance poster Arthur - smoke 'em out
im laughing ...Yes... the same as Walaytwo & Branno.... this is the HUMOUR section ... you know... some people
some people only see or read wot they want to read..I didn't see any insult either
I find cowardly appeasement quite sickly as well. Have you every read about 'The 9 11 truth'?I'm not sure what you mean by that question, Dedworth. Seems rather vague
Maybe you mean the rescuing of his family after 9/11:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/...in313048.shtml
Did you get permission to post this first anyway? It's apparently a subject which nobody is interested in around here, hence why the original OBL thread was closed.
Closed with a resounding "Osama bin Laden is dead. Period" Which, of course, nobody was refuting, only the year he died.
Call it a "conspiracy theory" but it's obvious Eddie admin was fighting a losing battle so he quickly nudged one of his mods to close the thread once he'd had the last word. Here's a guy who lectures on the importance of cross referencing, yet can't even get his numbers right on how many Brits visit the Philippines each year
What happened here is quite common in these situations. You present the true facts to somebody who is brainwashed and they will deny it. When their arguments become useless they just claim boredom with the subject. "More important things to worry about," is a common answer.
The US has a long history of concotting nonsense miltary tales. Look into the stories of Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch, the toppling of the Saddam statue. These Hollywood-like staged stories are facts, not "conspiracies".
And if you ever think our military efforts abroad are justified remember that the military industrial complex is a mighty beast that needs to be fed. It's a huge part of the economy, so it needs to keep turning over. Dropping bombs keeps folks in jobs, so we have these staged wars to keep the wheels turning. Some of the comments I've read on here seem to be in favor of mass genocide anyway, quite sick really
Anyways, I would love to stay and debate with you Dedworth, and it's been a pleasure to meet others here who dare to question media and government lies, but I'm going to jump before I'm pushed. It's been made quite clear to me that this forum is only for people who are interested in taking their wives to the UK, not a place to talk about such strong emotive subjects.
Peace all
Google it, its worth watching.
theres so many versions on that issue gwap, who do u believe caused it or who did it .? do you remember sunday bloody sunday ? who do you believe started that ... or who do you want to believe started it...
Like most decent people, we want to believe Laden was behind 9/11 and that Mcginness started the bloody sunday riots. The ironic thing is, is these 2 killers are members of parliament.
No such cover up there. As for much latter catastrophe, for me, there is much doubt.
I found out about the 9/11 truth last october. My brother in law. I was shocked. Please, those who have not seen it, please do.
The title "tramp" is surely an insult to women generally and to any here who,s wife has a tattooI didn't see any insult either
erm.....
Keith - Administrator
I'm bald and didn't even pay for it.
Good thing I'm not over-sensitive.
I have said before a couple of new members are ex-members on a wind up.
They surely have come to the site for help/advice chit chat etc about filipinos
After a couple of posts they dive in and add rubbish to the controversial posts which we all have a bit of fun with
It's to get us going and it works til they get banned which has happened to some new members rather quickly
They don't know but I could be already on their Forum
This was the first on Google after wikipediaerm.....
tramp (trmp)
v. tramped, tramp·ing, tramps
v.intr.
1. To walk with a firm, heavy step; trudge.
2.
a. To travel on foot; hike.
b. To wander about aimlessly.
v.tr.
1. To traverse on foot: tramp the fields.
2. To tread down; trample: tramp down snow.
n.
1.
a. A heavy footfall.
b. The sound produced by heavy walking or marching.
2. A walking trip; a hike.
3. One who travels aimlessly about on foot, doing odd jobs or begging for a living; a vagrant.
4.
a. A prostitute.
b. A person regarded as promiscuous.
5. Nautical A tramp steamer.
6. A metal plate attached to the sole of a shoe for protection, as when spading ground.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/tramp
The only relevant definition I can see is number 4
Not insulting?
Keith - Administrator
Fair enough You appear moraly versatile lucky your wife doesnt have "tramp stamps"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
