Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Tax fat, subsidise health ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,623
    Rep Power
    150
    A " fat tax " could be applied to everyone with a BMI over 30 - but that would never be accepted ! ( BMI can't be universally applied as a measure of obesity, and overweight non-smokers / non-drinkers in the UK might feel they deserve treatment for health complications of their lifestyle choice ).
    It's true fats aren't all bad - although they all contain the same levels of calories. It's the saturated fats such as those in dairy products and processed foods, and chemically altered trans fats ( also in processed foods ) which are bad in excess.
    Protein and carbohydrates, salt in moderation, and roughage ( fruit and vegetables ) all contribute to healthy eating ... the problem is that members who bother to read this thread - and educated members of the public - know that already ! Also with Christmas approaching it's hard always to be sensible with eating , drinking and exercising .
    A tax on unhealthy foods is only one possibility for dealing with an epidemic of obesity which increasingly individuals and governments can't afford. In September Hungary introduced taxes on a range of pre-packaged unhealthy foods with high salt and sugar content. But already food producers and others have criticised them, saying they're discriminatory, will hurt local businesses, and will affect poorer people disproportionately. Nutritional experts say that even if a vast range of foods are taxed, eating habits are unlikely to change - if someone wants a particular product they will have it, or something similar, no matter what.
    The " experts " are not always right, but WHO ( World Health Organisation ) says there are question marks over the effectiveness of taxes limited to a narrow range of products - and very few countries have so far gone down the taxation route.
    This debate will run and run - even if not on the forum. We all know the consequences of too many calories and too little exercise. It's how to tackle the problem successfully - all the more ironic and sad when malnutrition is also a problem, particularly in the Philippines.


  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    G.B. (IOM)
    Posts
    8,776
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Alan View Post
    In September Hungary introduced taxes on a range of pre-packaged unhealthy foods with high salt and sugar content. But already food producers and others have criticised them, saying they're discriminatory.........
    Perhaps it will force food manufacturers (of pre prepared foods etc) to lower the harmful element in the products.......if so then good!


  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Southern England
    Posts
    5,102
    Rep Power
    0
    I agree with the comment about processed foods...that comes under my 'Junk foods' heading along with foods high in salt and sugar ie processed foods.

    Since Jane arrived here 2 years ago this December 6 freshly made food made from raw ingredients makes up to nearly all my food intake.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Health & Care
    By John2 in forum Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14th July 2012, 07:43
  2. What do health reforms mean to YOU ?
    By Doc Alan in forum Health Issues
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 14th February 2012, 21:59
  3. health
    By stevewool in forum Loose Talk, Chat and Off Topic
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 1st September 2010, 22:32

Visitors found this page by searching for:

powered by vBulletin regional and global health issues

SEO Blog

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Filipino Forum : Philippine Forum