The right place for a foreign terrorist is a foreign prison cell

[Dedworth]

• Mrs May says she wants Qatada kicked out of Britain before the Olympics
• She warns he will be jailed again if he breaches terms of his release
• Hate preacher freed to walk his child to school within a week
• Former home secretary David Blunkett warns fanatic is 'extraordinarily dangerous and we don’t want him on our streets'
• Tory backbenchers jeered as Mrs May explained Government's opposition
• Preacher has cost Britain £1m in benefits, prison costs and legal fees
• As Qatada no longer has immigration status he cannot claim benefits

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1lkJsR5jZ

I'd say the right place was dangling from the end of a rope with a stretched and busted neck

[imagine]

theres too much pussy footing around, hangings too good for the likes, but it will do for starters

[Dedworth]

Unacceptable? You said it, Mrs May

On the day after a judge ordered the release on bail of hate preacher Abu Qatada, it emerges that six other highly dangerous terror suspects could follow him to freedom within weeks.

Just how much longer can our security be left at the mercy of foreign judges at the European Court of Human Rights?

It was on utterly spurious grounds that the ECHR banned Qatada’s deportation to face trial in Jordan, arguing that although he himself was guaranteed humane treatment, there was a hypothetical possibility he might face evidence extracted from others under torture.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...#ixzz1lkSQsKAe

[bigmarco]

Cases like this just make this country a laughing stock. We just don't seem to be in control of whats going on within our own borders anymore. This piece of should be on the first plane to whoever wants him and the sooner we stop allowing ourselves to be dictated to by these crazy european courts the better. I am not European I am British and I want to live in Britain under British Law.

[grahamw48]

I'll second that mate.

Time for us to tell the ECHR to stick it, and get out now.

The security of our country and everyone living in it is under threat.

It's been reported that it is likely to cost an estimated £40 million to keep a constant eye on that Abu .

[KeithD]

The problem is the guy hasn't been charged with anything

[grahamw48]

Any person considered 'undesirable' can be kicked out.

It's about time we were given our country back, and the right to govern it with our own laws.

[KeithD]

Any person considered 'undesirable' can be kicked out.

Who are you kidding?

[joebloggs]

looks like may got a good
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ept-quiet.html

Peter Bone (Con, Wellingborough) said: ‘She could be a national hero if she picks up the phone and orders Qatada to be sent back to Jordan tonight!’

Mrs May thanked Mr Bone for his colourful language but said that ‘the right course was to pursue negotiations’.

She said that ‘the highest courts in our land’ had found against Qatada but still we could not deport him. If that is the case, clearly they are not the ‘highest courts in our land’. They have been outcourted.

Mark Pritchard (Con, The Wrekin) said that the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) was ‘undermining British justice’. He urged Mrs May temporarily to suspend our membership of it.

Stewart Jackson (Con, Peterborough) was ‘appalled and disgusted’ by the decision of an immigration court to release Qatada on bail.

Eleanor Laing (Con, Epping Forest) said ‘enough is enough’. Bob Stewart (Con, Beckenham) made a yarny speech about how war regulations were suitable, given the hostility of Qatada.

Anne Main (Con, St Albans), who can be the living, snorting, embodiment of a busty strop – magnificently so – opined that the ‘rights of terrorists now trump the rights of British citizens’.

Dominic Raab (Con, Esher & Walton) held that it was ‘time for Britain to say no to Strasbourg’.

Philip Davies (Con, Shipley) said ‘a proud, sovereign country’ was being denied the right to deport a wrong ’un. David Ruffley (Con, Bury St Edmunds) suggested that we should simply ignore the ECHR. Italy did. Mrs May wilted and wimpered.

DOMINIC Grieve, Attorney General, sat through some of this, recoiling his chin in lawyerly indignation when he heard the Tories attacking the ECHR. No wonder Julian Brazier (Con, Canterbury) spoke of ‘the tyranny of lawyers’.

Jason McCartney (Con, Colne Valley) said that if the ECHR fined us for deporting Qatada, he would happily stick fifty quid in the pot. Mrs May blandly said that we had to ‘operate within the legal framework’.


mays days have to be numbered,

[Terpe]

The problem is the guy hasn't been charged with anything..

Correct

Any person considered 'undesirable' can be kicked out...

Incorrect.


Here is an interesting article which goes some way in explaining the stupidity and complicity of our own authorities and agencies in bringing this case to it's current status.

[grahamw48]

Who are you kidding?

I meant when we have OUR laws back. ....you know, like most other 'free' countries in the world.

[Iani]

So, how about, he is released - and taken straight to the nearest police cell. There, he could be "interrogated and charged" by a Gene Hunt style cop "You are charged with being a pain in the ...."
Then straight into a waiting white van..............to Heathrow............to a cargo plane..... oh I think you can see where this is going.

Alternatively, there could be just a simple declaration. "This man who is being released at 1.00pm on such and such a date, is someone who would like to bomb us all. He does not recognise British freedoms, and we the British government and police forces, would now like to declare that we in turn do not recognise him, or will afford him the protection of the said British institutions, from the time of 12.59 and 59 seconds"

Then sit back with the popcorn

[Dedworth]

Grey Man + Ski Mask + Gun + Early Morning Wake Up Call

[grahamw48]

We could easily rid our country of such scum if we weren't governed by a bunch of gutless self-serving door-mats.

[tone]

What I want to know is who paid for his legal fees....

How on earth can this guy still be alive "outside" the law??

[Dedworth]

According to the Socialist BBC he's a "radical" and shouldn't be referred to as an "extremist"

Whose side are they on? BBC tells journalists to stop calling Qatada 'an extremist' - and showing pics of him looking fat (but we can, so here he is!)

• The term 'extremist' suggest a value judgement, say Beeb bosses
• Cleric should instead be described as 'radical'
• David Cameron accused of 'complacency' over Qatada situation

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1loY9u9pa

[grahamw48]

BBC can get stuffed.

I didn't realise they were governing the country now, as well as discriminating against older and whiter employees.

[Iani]

No!

With all due respect BBC (And that due respect - is none), he is not a radical.

William Wilberforce was a radical, leading the call to abolish the vile slave trade. Winston Churchill was a radical - rejecting the easy way of an alliance with Germany, instead to take on what at the time was pretty much the whole world as an enemy.
The Tolpuddle Martyrs were radicals, wanting to improve their lives by forming a labour association - and with the results they lost.

This "person" isn't fit to lick the ground they once walked on. He is no radical

[joebloggs]

could be a bit of good news

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...over-qatada.do

[grahamw48]

Just watching the new '10 O'Clock Live' comedy current affairs show on Channel 4.

Their take on Abu whatsisname the terrorist and other issues we've been discussing have been absolutely hilarious.