I just mean that if Dave Cameron can count benefits in kind in lieu of monetary benefit payments then the reverse ought to stand when counting what an applicant earns....IanI could then do exactly as he suggested.....It's called a benefit in kind - and is treated for tax reasons as income, rightly so as this would otherwise open up a tax loophole you could drive a spaceship through, never mind a tank (Oh we won't pay you any wages, but we'll pay your mortgage, give you Sainsburys vouchers, give you a car.......you can just imagine).
Well I can't find it anywhere, but could this not be classed as income and added to salary to make this 18K?
Ref the BBC article...in Post #4
