Quote Originally Posted by bigmarco View Post
Well my immediate thought on this is if the government doesn't feel you can survive as a couple on less than £18,600 per annum, why are the benefits for the unemplloyed not set at this level.
You're not supposed to find obvious holes in May's ideas ..... and where does the £18,600 come from? This is not much money in London, and it as hell of a lot for someone in Newcastle

This will at some point go to court and the government will lose, and as with Labour's '21' rule the UKBA will then have to go through all the back cases!!