Could anyone issue their support against the New Rules?

[yellowcloud]

Andy, cheers mate.

If anyones interested in seeing how the UK now fares to other country's immigration restrictions check this out

http://www.mipex.eu/blog/cant-buy-me-love

[yellowcloud]

An interesting article which

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...g-7939667.html

the OBR states that migrants actually benefit the UK Economy and remember the reason T May brough in these changes was because she said she can interfere with the Human rights of British citzens on the basis of the

economic well-being of the country.

http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrig...d-corresp.html

[andy222]

There will be a way round this for us yellowcloud its just finding it.

[Arthur Little]

Lets face it do I really want to bring her to this sh**hole?

... who can blame you, Andy? Shhole, notwithstanding, it OUGHT to be your RIGHT to do so!

[yellowcloud]

Ahh Green rejects the findings of the OBR

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18826606?

SAying that

"fails to take account of the costs of immigration."

"Uncontrolled migration places unacceptable pressure on the UK's public services, infrastructure and jobs market," he told BBC News.

However, the economy has benefited - by £6billion a year - from the influx of migrant workers.

The money raised from new workers paying income tax and VAT goes directly to the Treasury to be spent on essential services including schools, hospitals and transport.

Plus last year, 207,000 British citizens - one every three minutes - left the country while 510,000 foreigners arrived to stay for a year or more.

I would like to see the figures of costs of immigration, together with the fact that on average 207,000 British citizens leave the UK each year, that £6billion a year is generated by migrant workers to the UK economy together with OBRs findings and see the full picture.

[yellowcloud]

... who can blame you, Andy? Shhole, notwithstanding, it OUGHT to be your RIGHT to do so!

It is still (should be) your right to live in your own country with your own wife, no matter where she is from and it should not be constringent upon money or wage at all. Australia and New Zealand and Canada do not have a maintenance requirement at all.

[yellowcloud]

I,m in a real mess then lol as my bloody MP is Vince Cable he is MP for Twickenham the part of London I come under so i,m sunk before I start as he is so far up Camerons that I will have no chance.

Jack did you get a reply from Vince Clark

http://vincentcable.org.uk/en/contact

Would be great to get him onside and if we can get his name to this it would be amazing!!!

http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2012-13/335

Jack it is your right to request a meeting with him as he is your MP! also you can see him at his surgery, for the sake of others families you would be helping so much if you could do this.

This is a copy of my letter I have sent to various people who can help.



Dear,

I would like to ask you to join other MPs to oppose the inhumane restrictions on UK families and if you can help in any possible way and to add your name to the Early day motion 297, please see link below

http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2012-13/335

Please could you also pass this onto other MPs who would be willing to put their name to this or can help in any way?

In short these new rules prevent a UK Citizen from having family life in the UK with their non - EU Spouse if they earn less than £18,600, British citizens with non-EU Spouses living abroad who can not make that much for 6 months in the UK will be exiled from their country or leave their family behind. An EU Citizen ie a Greek person can bring his or her NON EU Spouse to live in the UK without having to meet any of these new restrictions but the UK Government has put these unfair restrictions on its own citizens.

Damien Green tell us that they government can do this as the Human rights act is a qualified right, which is true but Green argues they can interfere with the Human rights act in this case on the basis to protect the Economic well being of the UK, however he has shown no figures to support that spouses/fiances or families effect the UK Economy negatively and in fact I suspect that family migrant/spouses/fiances have a positive effect on the UK economy. Greens other argument is that the UK sponsors benefits could increase due to the presence of his/her migrant spouse however many UK Sponsors don't claim any benefits and no not receive an increase in their benefits due to the presence of their migrant spouse and again Green has not shown how much benefit has been increased due to the presence of the Migrant Spouse or compared to how much migrant spouses/fiances have contributed to the UK economy which I suspect would be far higher than ANY possible increase in any benefits that might have occurred to the UK Sponsors benefits due to the presence of his NON EU Spouse. It must also be noted that the Migrant spouse is NOT entitled to claim ANY public funds and does not receive any as is the stipulation in their visa.

For case studies please see link

http://www.jcwi.org.uk/sites/default/files/UBLfinal.pdf


Yours Faithfully,