Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: NEW Family Migration Immigration Rule efffective July 9, 2002

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Newbie (Restricted Access) Lin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Paranaque, Manila
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    0

    NEW Family Migration Immigration Rule efffective July 9, 2002

    Introducing a new minimum income threshold of L 18,000 pound for sponsoring the settlement in the Uk . . . . Is it a minimum income of 18,000 pound a year? I think there is no salary in UK that cost 18,000 pound per month. pls help, I need an advice, cause my BF work only in TESCO, I don't think so if his salary morethan 18,000, we are planning to get married next year.


  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    G.B. (IOM)
    Posts
    8,776
    Rep Power
    0
    It is £18600 per year.


  3. #3
    Newbie (Restricted Access) Lin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Paranaque, Manila
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    0
    yeahhhhhhhh thanks


  4. #4
    Newbie (Restricted Access) Lin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Paranaque, Manila
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    0
    Correction: July 9, 2012


  5. #5
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Lin View Post
    cause my BF work only in TESCO, I don't think so if his salary morethan 18,000, we are planning to get married next year.
    TESCO, gWapito, is Tesco paying just the minimum wage, how can it be when your in the 40% club



    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


  6. #6
    Newbie (Restricted Access) Lin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Paranaque, Manila
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    0
    Yeahhhhhhhh thanks


  7. #7
    Respected Member imagine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    7,064
    Rep Power
    150
    Hi Lin, i doubt is pay will be more than the £18600 per year. unless perhaps he's a manager


  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    G.B. (IOM)
    Posts
    8,776
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by imagine View Post
    Hi Lin, i doubt is pay will be more than the £18600 per year. unless perhaps he's a manager
    Could be a super shelf stacker....

    I have heard there is good money to be had stacking shelves on the night shift, with overtime...

    Mind you, that was a few years ago. Since then, they have been known to pay nothing.


  9. #9
    Respected Member malchard888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    uxbridge
    Posts
    473
    Rep Power
    58
    One unjust point about this £18600 threshold is that it doesnt take into account the location of the U.K. based employee.If u work in central London such an amount is probably easily achieveable especially with London weighting which I believe exceeds £3000 p.a. whereas maybe in the north of the country for many it would be more difficult but it doesnt take into account the disparity in the cost of living. London and the south east prices particularly for housing would consume a fair amount from a salary whereas other parts of the country will be far cheaper places to live so maybe disposable income would even itself out. but this government have taken this figure across the board but then again do we expect them ever to be fair when it comes to peoples lives and loves.


  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    G.B. (IOM)
    Posts
    8,776
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by malchard888 View Post
    One unjust point about this £18600 threshold is that it doesnt take into account the location of the U.K. based employee.If u work in central London such an amount is probably easily achieveable especially with London weighting which I believe exceeds £3000 p.a. whereas maybe in the north of the country for many it would be more difficult but it doesnt take into account the disparity in the cost of living. London and the south east prices particularly for housing would consume a fair amount from a salary whereas other parts of the country will be far cheaper places to live so maybe disposable income would even itself out. but this government have taken this figure across the board but then again do we expect them ever to be fair when it comes to peoples lives and loves.

    Exactly. But it isn't as simple as London / South East compared with the rest of Britain. For example Aberdeen is an expensive place to live. So is the IOM and there are others. I suggested a postcode based system but then that would be difficult to implement thoroughly.

    I believe Dave Cameron has been looking at dishing out benefit levels according to region....


  11. #11
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by lastlid View Post
    I suggested a postcode based system but then that would be difficult to implement thoroughly.

    I believe Dave Cameron has been looking at dishing out benefit levels according to region....
    thats crazy so how could it work , by region - n/w , s/e or by cities ? each city has wealthy and poor areas just as regions, so someone on the other side of the road could be getting more
    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    G.B. (IOM)
    Posts
    8,776
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by joebloggs View Post
    thats crazy so how could it work , by region - n/w , s/e or by cities ? each city has wealthy and poor areas just as regions, so someone on the other side of the road could be getting more
    Of course. I agree. How to make it fairer? A flat rate isn't fair either.

    "Regional rates of benefits - which would presumably see people in more affluent regions getting higher payments than in poorer regions - would be likely to prove controversial."

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18575453


  13. #13
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150
    the only way to make it fair is the way it was before, its not what you get paid, its how much disposable income you have left, you could be working part time but own your own house or live with your parents so your not paying rent, or even all the utils bills but have more disposable income than someone who has to pay rent or mortgage and earning £20k a year.
    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    G.B. (IOM)
    Posts
    8,776
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by joebloggs View Post
    the only way to make it fair is the way it was before, its not what you get paid, its how much disposable income you have left, you could be working part time but own your own house or live with your parents so your not paying rent, or even all the utils bills but have more disposable income than someone who has to pay rent or mortgage and earning £20k a year.
    Ah. But that takes some effort on the governments part ( and cost ).


  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Worcestershire
    Posts
    59
    Rep Power
    0
    Aren't you working Lin??? coz if you are also working, there isn't no problem about the £18600 minimum income.


  16. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Marikina City
    Posts
    26,785
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Tinker View Post
    Aren't you working Lin??? coz if you are also working, there isn't no problem about the £18600 minimum income.
    Lin is in the Philippines and her boyfriend is in UK.
    As such the £18600 minimum income is a key factor. (unless there are exemptions)


  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    west yorkshire
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    0
    i think anyone should be able to marry the woman they love and the government should allow but just ban us from benefits job done i would have thought


  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Worcestershire
    Posts
    59
    Rep Power
    0
    Terpe,
    I see..that is really a problem though.


  19. #19
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Marikina City
    Posts
    26,785
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Tinker View Post
    Terpe,
    I see..that is really a problem though.
    Yes Tinker, these new rules are just so very unfair and are hitting genuine couple very hard indeed.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Residency ending on July under Surrinder Singh Rule...Whats next??
    By macky in forum UK VISA/British Citizenship
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 30th April 2013, 16:14
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 14th July 2012, 10:42
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 9th July 2012, 16:20
  4. Family migration changes announced - updated
    By joebloggs in forum UK Immigration
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 15th June 2012, 06:47
  5. Family migration changes announced
    By joebloggs in forum UK Immigration
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12th June 2012, 10:52

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Filipino Forum : Philippine Forum