I'm offended!

[KeithD]

.....however this is not the British press who gladly have to be more careful on what they print.

By NOT the British press I take it you do not include the Independent, Daily Post, Mirror, Daily Mail, Telegraph, etc that are listed with such words /phrases on Google then?

I'm bored now.... lets just accept that the majority on here are right and a minor minority of a minor minority of 2 is wrong

[lordna]

By NOT the British press I take it you do not include the Independent, Daily Post, Mirror, Daily Mail, Telegraph, etc that are listed with such words /phrases on Google then?

I'm bored now.... lets just accept that the majority on here are right and a minor minority of a minor minority of 2 is wrong

I thought i was now alone as the other person who dares to challenge anything said here has been banned?

[raynaputi]

I thought i was now alone as the other person who dares to challenge anything said here has been banned?

He told me a few days ago that he won't go back and post to the forum unless I reinstate the neg rep I gave him. He even said goodbye and he doesn't want to be here as members here are a bunch of numpties. Yet he keeps on posting and stirring people up in every chance he get, even in unrelated topics, just so he can get the last word. Admin banned him for that. Not because he's challenging people here, but because of his attitude. I've got a few debates with some of these members he's against with too and yet those members and I still have a laugh over some topics at the end of the day, as we're not getting seriously affected with each other's ideas and points of views. It would be an advantage for him being out of the forum though, as he'll get more time with his wife and new born baby, instead being here online most of the time.

[KeithD]

I thought i was now alone as the other person who dares to challenge anything said here has been banned?

He was banned for numerous reasons, not one of them to do with challenging anything. Complaints against him have been received for months now, members only get X amount before action is taken, and the person in question was given numerous occassions to change over that time. You've made an incorrect assumption again!

[lordna]

He was banned for numerous reasons, not one of them to do with challenging anything. Complaints against him have been received for months now, members only get X amount before action is taken, and the person in question was given numerous occassions to change over that time. You've made an incorrect assumption again!

I stand corrected....but what was the other incorrect assumtion?