Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Sgt Danny Nightingale's conviction quashed

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    18,267
    Rep Power
    0

    Sgt Danny Nightingale's conviction quashed

    Former SAS sniper Danny Nightingale 'elated' as court quashes weapon conviction

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...onviction.html



    He still faces a retrial on these disgraceful charges


  2. #2
    Respected Member bigmarco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    SW London
    Posts
    4,053
    Rep Power
    150
    Pleased to read this although not happy that he has to face a retrial. Lets hope common sense prevails


  3. #3
    Moderator joebloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    23,162
    Rep Power
    150
    brave guy but he had an illegal gun
    http://www.filipinouk.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=870&dateline=1270312908


  4. #4
    Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spain since 1988. My wife has been here since June 2006
    Posts
    2,384
    Rep Power
    101
    The conviction was quashed because the trial judge made an error in his advice, not because there was any doubt about the evidence


  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    18,267
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by johncar54 View Post
    The conviction was quashed because the trial judge made an error in his advice, not because there was any doubt about the evidence
    Correct that is why further public money will be wasted on a retrial involving charges that should never have been made in the first instance


  6. #6
    Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spain since 1988. My wife has been here since June 2006
    Posts
    2,384
    Rep Power
    101
    Dedworth, that's one point of view but as Joe said, even brave soldiers cannot bring firearms into the country, and I believe, Sgt Nightingale pleaded guilty to doing that, but now says that was not a free choice, is for a jury to decide.

    If he knowingly did it, then he is guilty of a serious offence.

    His hourable past is mitigation on what sentence he should receive, not a defence


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Sgt Nightingale Freed
    By Dedworth in forum News UK
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30th November 2012, 14:26
  2. Please sign the petition for sgt Nightingale
    By les_taxi in forum Loose Talk, Chat and Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 27th November 2012, 23:29

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Filipino Forum : Philippine Forum