Quote Originally Posted by bigmac View Post
I can't understand why people are backing someone who admits causing physical harm to a woman. There is no reason, excuse or defense. It is also unlawful.

That cuts both ways. Back in the 70's--I was what is now called a battered husband.

During 13 years of marriage to a high-control religious maniac---I had furniture thrown at me-- a 10" blade kitchen knife thrust at me--I dodged it--it ended up stuck in the door-----and my nose smashed by a punch in the face while I was fast asleep in bed. But--as usual--I kept shtoom--no one else knew about it.

I can't understand why people are backing someone who admits causing physical harm to a woman. There is no reason, excuse or defense. It is also unlawful

Well--Gwap has been on here many years--and obviously has a number of fans --?-----me included.

So--to call him a blatant liar--?? can you cite an example?
Thanks Bigmac

My detractors have chosen to ignore certain details.

In April 2010 Jane hospitalised me with a gouged eye. The reason for this assault was because I dared turn my back on her in bed.

I could have got her arrested. I chose not to. She offered to leave, worried that the violence would get worse. It didn't.
In the February 2012 she came at me again. This was when I struck out first.

I could not believe it myself. Not in the 27 years I was with my first wife or the short time I was with Gemma. .did I ever put a hand to them.

My first wife currently cleans my house while I Skype Gemma.

Jane would be the first to agree that at times she could be a hell cat.

Until you've experienced living with one of these articles, you haven't got a clue.

It was suggested Jane lived in fear of me. What a ridiculous notion. Jane fears nothing and no one. If there's one thing I'm sure of, she's well equipped look after herself and the boys.

Woe betide anyone thinking otherwise.

It was said earlier that I've come out with the truth now coz of Jane showing a picture. Answer to that is No....the judge dismissed it as it was supposed to be related to an event that happened 15 months earlier.

This is why my solicitor did not use my daughter's pics of me in hospital ...as my solicitor put it, it was old news. It wouldn't wash.

Not forgetting here, we just had a 5 week relationship which she just ended last night. If I was such a brute, would she have ever entertained me? I think not.

You are right Bigmac. .she used me for the funds for the playhouse. Like she used me back in September to be a driver for her looking at council houses ... yes, even then she used me.

No doubt when she's sick of her current beau. ..which won't be long as he's no property and money. ..she will be back on my case again.