Bigmarco, sorry your prejudice is showing. I said “He was acquitted and probably would not have been prosecuted if he had been anybody but a police officer”. That is fact.

My post was in answer to Joe, who asked why ‘Kevin’ was prosecuted.

Joe, I might (wrongly) not agree with your opinion based on years of experience John, but i hope i never abuse anyone on here

In the post I explained what happens and almost certainly the reason why the prosecution was brought. I cannot see why you would disagree. Especially as you ‘seem’ to saying he should not have been prosecuted Which is what I am saying too. We agree I think.


PS Of course the jury finding does not prevent the complainant taking action for damages in the civil court, where the degree of proof is on balance of probability, if her 'legal team' believe there is reliable evidence, albeit not sufficient to convince a jury 'beyond all reasonable doubt'. (as in O.J. Simpson case).