Though it's hard to make any great claim of consistency from this government, one thing it has been steadfast about is performance-related pay. Why should people who are not up to the job reap the benefits of those who excel? Why should the taxpayers shell out for failure ?
read more here .. http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...gration-policy
Typical biased Guardian reporting
In your opinion Joe how does her "performance" compare with her predecessors from the last Labour Govt ?
For example did the likes of Jacqui Sniff, Charles Clarke and John Reid ever manage to deport any islamic hate preachers/terrorists or were they too busy fiddling their expenses ? What clampdowns if any did they introduce on sham colleges and student visa abuse ?
None.............. I was right - but it was fine to keep the floodgates of uncontrolled immigration open allowing untold scum, criminals and other assorted filth in as they would all become future labour voters
100% correct and another thing ban the Bloody Burka!Originally Posted by Dedworth
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24858574Only 1.5% of reports alleging illegal immigration result in a person being removed from the UK, MPs have said.
Personally I think her time is up. She's getting to many of the wrong headlines and things are not improving to any great extent. Time to give Mark Harper a go in the top job.
and the daily mail is not biased
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Quote Reply