The only reason any political party would want to give to give 16 year-olds the vote is because they consider such children to be impressionable, and useful for their cause.
For goodness sake. They may well live to be a hundred now.
Let them have some youth.
ExactlyThe only reason any political party would want to give to give 16 year-olds the vote is because they consider such children to be impressionable, and useful for their cause
There are a large percentage of adults that are just as impressionable in a debate like this as it has got the interest of people who don't normally pay any attention to politics and therefore don't know anything about it. In my eyes they are just as dangerous as so called impressionable youths.
Who said anything about impressionable people being dangerous ?
I'd have thought it was those attempting to manipulate young (or ignorant) minds who were potentially the dangerous ones.
Sorry Graham my use of the word dangerous was perhaps wrong. But I just meant there are many adults who are no more knowledgeable than the younger voters and yet there us no question of them being allowed to vote.
I totally agree the politicians are the dangerous ones no matter what side they are on!
Possibly...But at least they have paid more tax.Sorry Graham my use of the word dangerous was perhaps wrong. But I just meant there are many adults who are no more knowledgeable than the younger voters and yet there us no question of them being allowed to vote.
That has to count for something surely?
A lot of the older ones shouldn't be allowed to reproduce, nevermind vote...but don't start me on that.
Talking of which, at least Salmond has managed to move on from his TV show....
.
I thought I saw her on the news last night Arthur.
Agree on Rab C...one of the funniest things to come out of Scotland.
Remember the Hamlet Cigars ad too ?
.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)