But how can they sentence anyone who is not 100% guilty at all?
Do they judge that if the evidence is, let's say, 75% guilty, they are classed as guilty?
Why are they jailed at all if the evidence is not 100%?
But how can they sentence anyone who is not 100% guilty at all?
Do they judge that if the evidence is, let's say, 75% guilty, they are classed as guilty?
Why are they jailed at all if the evidence is not 100%?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)