Originally Posted by
johncar54
I have always thought that it is 'somewhat unfair' to release a person's name, almost in any criminal case, until that person is convicted.
It is inevitable that some members of the community will always say, and maybe believe, that there is no smoke without fire and, therefore, if the person is not subsequently convicted, that they 'got away with it'.
The newspaper report in this case says, 'the case was dropped due to insufficient evidence'. Implying there was some evidence, so Pritchard has not had his reputation restored.