http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...mment-84433032
A Rodgers mug buy. I can't see the Yanks putting up with his Irish blarney for much longer
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...mment-84433032
A Rodgers mug buy. I can't see the Yanks putting up with his Irish blarney for much longer
We all said what a crazy buy on here Ded but no one listened![]()
Didn't Chelsea buy Torres for £50M?
ManU paid £12M for Wilfried Zaha who did squat, and that was a Fergie buy. Not forgetting £26M for Anderson back in 2007, 8 years - 9 goals, a huge fee then.
Balo was a gamble, and hasn't started many games. We knew he was lazy, but he's done better than podgy Lambert![]()
Keith - Administrator
True Keith but both United players were somewhat unknown ability wise we all knew Balo was a joke buy before you got him and let's not forget that amazing flop Andy Carrol who you paid shed loads for![]()
Balo has unknown ability, he has no idea where it is![]()
Keith - Administrator
Also it seemed Torres was the man when Chelsea bought him he was just a one or 2 season wonder I guess
Torres was a much better buy according to these TalkSport figures
Fernando Torres – Liverpool to Chelsea – £50m in 2011
105 Premier League appearances / 19 goals
13 FA Cup appearances / Three goals
Six League Cup appearances / Three goals
37 European appearances / 16 goals
Three other appearances / Two goals
Cost per Premier League goal – £2,631,579
Cost per goal overall – £1,162,791
Read more at http://talksport.com/football/shock-...fJYCC8JREXX.99
I think most folk would agree that 1 goal every 4 matches for a £50M is really crap, you should get a Ronaldo/Messi level of goals at that price. Balo has been crap, but he hasn't started many games. A lot of City players have been pants this season, and they don't come cheap.
Keith - Administrator
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)