Quote Originally Posted by SimonH View Post

Lord Sewel, chairman of committees (responsible for overseeing standards of behaviour among peers), effectively says it's ok if you don't get caught and then if you do get caught use the old school playground excuse that all the other boys do it.

Typical Labour hypocrite, do as as say and not as I do.
Whilst his sleazy antics are unbecoming of someone who's responsible for the oversight of Members' moral conduct ... such hypocrisy is rampant among Parliamentarians of ALL political persuasions as I've highlighted in #13 above.

Indeed, two things actually rankle me more about this whole sordid business ... and the first of those may be found roughly midway down the page of the subsequent link provided by Dedworth, in which ...

... Sewell bemoans the £200 daily allowance he receives for
attending the House of Lords - where, in keeping with his fellow peers, he probably snores his way through the mundane proceedings - as a mere "pittance", ffs!

Whilst the second relates to London Manila's question ...

Quote Originally Posted by London_Manila View Post

I wonder how much The Sun paid these hookers to video this setup
... concerning the underhand tactics of The Sun newspaper in bribing the prostitutes to go along with its scheme to implant secret cameras in the guy's flat in order to discredit his reputation and thereby boost sales by sensationalising next morning's headlines at the same time ... a thoroughly despicable, dirty tricks practice!