Active members

[mickcant]

... and it's [occasionally] the same story when you give out rep - without even receiving so much as the common courtesy of an acknowledgement - it's as though [a few] haven't a clue... ... what rep is!

From rep messages I have received, I seem to get into a jumble as to who they are from and often cant thank people because I am not that sure who they are from.

I do keep trying to give them for good post but am often told to spread them around first.

Mick.

[Arthur Little]

and some who do know but very very rarely give out, though they have received many in return..

From rep messages I have received, I seem to get into a jumble as to who they are from and often cant thank people because I am not that sure who they are from.

I do keep trying to give them for good post but am often told to spread them around first.

Mick.

's true, guys ... on each of these counts. ... I used to think ALL members were able to see who'd given them *rep, but have, of course, long~since discovered only the Forum Administration + Moderators can access such information.

This means ... unless the donor specifies who *it's from (personally, I always do!) then the recipient will be none the wiser.

[Slip]

From rep messages I have received, I seem to get into a jumble as to who they are from and often cant thank people because I am not that sure who they are from.

I do keep trying to give them for good post but am often told to spread them around first.

Mick.

I give rep if it allows me, without saying spread it around! But like Mick says, half the time I have no idea who gives me rep.