... following the couple's express desire to step back from public duties in order to raise their son in Canada.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-meghans-plans ...
... following the couple's express desire to step back from public duties in order to raise their son in Canada.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-meghans-plans ...
Well ...Originally Posted by Arthur Little
... following the couple's express desire to step back from public duties in order to raise their son in Canada.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-meghans-plans ...... good luck to them, I say!
How many Royals do we need ?
Goodbye and good luck...especially with the gutter press.
We don't need any at all
If you cant take the heat, stay out of the kitchen
Yes good luck to them all, not a fan of these two, they seem to want the publicity when they want it , but then cry about it too, was someone’s mother like that once .
cant be easy for him , he didn't choose his position , he was born into it, i don't blame him and wish him well
Agree Stewart.
He's also had a lot of pressures put on him since being a very young boy. Can't be easy, staying 'balanced' .
I've never really understood the adulation for the Royal Family. Born into a privileged life.... and done....er.....what exactly?
Answers on a shrivelled up postage stamp.
iv never been a fan of the royals but i look at it this way they are a part of our heritage and our culture, and if it came to a vote royalty or no royalty i would vote for royalty, enough of our culture has already been chipped away, so up the Royals, up the poppy and everything thats English, is it still legal to be English or do i have to be britishI've never really understood the adulation for the Royal Family. Born into a privileged life.... and done....er.....what exactly?
Answers on a shrivelled up postage stamp.
Maybe, but they belong in a different world to the average person so they may as well be aliens.
They are a huge and profitable tourist attraction.
They have done me no harm.
They do TRY to set high standards.
Yet the taxpayer has to subsidise them!
1. See above. Wouldn't call that "high standards".
2. Does that include old boy Phil and his errant mouth?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Quote Reply
