To start with...lets be honest just because sombody is found guilty by a jury that doesnt mean to say that they acutally commited a crime...i think that is a given...hence the numerous cases every year in which many people are acquitted of crimes...
secondly i have done plenty of background work on this case, and so am well aware of his imprisonment and the details of the case, as i do in fact live in Mr Ladva's home town and sat in the public gallery of the court case(seeing this as a useful opportunity for to gain experience for my Law Degree)
finally the point of my message was not to suggest Mr ladva is innocent, nor to suggest that what, if anything, he did was wrong-
BUT to suggest that everyone in this forum as at some stage done something wrong ( i thus refer to the "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" comment) AND furthermore to raise the issue that if a jury of his peers(representatives of the Great British Legal System) have found him guilty, then the Judge Dodgson(also a representative of the Great British Legal System) have decided his three year sentence is sufficient punishment and once served he should therefore be forgiven.
I appologise if this post is slightly above the intellectual level of many people who have posted on this thread, but i feel comments on this issue could be more insightful than "sending him to Lebanon" OR "having five minutes in a dark alley with him"(on that topic...doesnt that strike anyone else as slightly GAY?)
