Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: Good News - 2 charged over Poppy Burning protest

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Moderator Arthur Little's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    City of Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    24,230
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by bornatbirth View Post
    is it a real poppy or a model poppy because if they burnt a model poppy they didnt burn a real poppy, so what law did they break
    It's the SIGNIFICANCE of what they did that counts ... i.e., insulting the memory of our war dead!


  2. #2
    Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spain since 1988. My wife has been here since June 2006
    Posts
    2,384
    Rep Power
    103
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Little View Post
    It's the SIGNIFICANCE of what they did that counts ... i.e., insulting the memory of our war dead!
    Sorry to keep on repeating this but it seems to have been misunderstood.

    Insulting our dead is not a criminal offence, as distasteful and disgusting we may believe it to be.

    In this case it that , in doing so, they also did, all of these:-

    * three or more persons
    * present together
    * used or threatened
    * unlawful violence
    * so that the conduct of them (taken together) would cause
    * a person of reasonable firmness
    * present at the scene
    * to fear for his or her personal safety.

    Thus a section 2 offence, and that is what they have been charged with. If the prosecution cannot prove all these points, it appears, that a conviction will not be obtained.


  3. #3
    Moderator Arthur Little's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    City of Perth, Scotland
    Posts
    24,230
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by johncar54 View Post
    Sorry to keep on repeating this but it seems to have been misunderstood.

    Insulting our dead is not a criminal offence, as distasteful and disgusting we may believe it to be.

    In this case it that , in doing so, they also did, all of these:-

    * three or more persons
    * present together
    * used or threatened
    * unlawful violence
    * so that the conduct of them (taken together) would cause
    * a person of reasonable firmness
    * present at the scene
    * to fear for his or her personal safety.

    Thus a section 2 offence, and that is what they have been charged with. If the prosecution cannot prove all these points, it appears, that a conviction will not be obtained.
    In that case, hopefully they can be charged with 'inciting civil unrest' ... which surely constitutes an offence at the very least!


  4. #4
    Respected Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Spain since 1988. My wife has been here since June 2006
    Posts
    2,384
    Rep Power
    103
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Little View Post
    In that case, hopefully they can be charged with ... which surely consitutes an offence at the very least!
    But, isn't that in effect what they have been charged with ?

    Whilst it maybe that a charge 'inciting civil unrest' could be brought under Common Law, I don't think such an offence is known to UK Statute Law, but I won't take bets on it!

    However, it is standard practice to not bring Common Law charges where there are adequate Staute Law offences.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 8th November 2014, 15:38
  2. IS this good news?
    By mick foreman in forum Help & Advice
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 5th August 2014, 20:20
  3. good news
    By stevewool in forum Loose Talk, Chat and Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19th April 2013, 13:04

Visitors found this page by searching for:

MOHAMMAD MASUDUL HAQUE UK BORDER AGENCY

Mohammad Masudul Haque home office ref:H1094810

Mohammad masudul haque home office uk ref-H1094810/2

H1094810/2

103 hervey close london N3 2HH.mohammad masudul haque

mohammad masudul haque H1094810 home office uk

Mohammad masudul haque home office ref-H1094810/2 date of birth-01 october1981 country-bangladesh i want find uk border agency crd team resul up details

Uk home office ref-H1094810

Address-103 Hervey close london N3 2HH.Mohammad Masudul Haque home office ref-H1094810/2

Uk border agency mohammad masudul haque crd contact team

SEO Blog

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Filipino Forum : Philippine Forum