Family Visit Visa..please help!

[bigmac]

Of course they affect me if you read my posts on the subject.?

@andy 222 that reply by me was not directed at you



It didnt affect me when we lodge my application that time BUT even if it the financial requirement was passed before I applied, it wont affect us. Luckily my husbands earnings is just a little bit over the said requirement so it wouldnt be any problem.

@melovesengland---then you are very fortunate--compared to the OP--myself--and no doubt many others,

a little bit of sympathy and understanding wouldnt come amiss---just bear in mind it all changed last july--and some of us are now caught in a trap beyond our control.

I am a taxpayer and to be honest ''18,600'' is just pretty average earnings for a couple

yes--sars NV--as you say--for a couple--but it can be a dream wage for a single person trying to sponsor his partner--as the OP is.

[joebloggs]

a little bit of sympathy and understanding wouldnt come amiss---just bear in mind it all changed last july--and some of us are now caught in a trap beyond our control.

my sympathy you have , it should be your legal right to bring your spouse and family here..

even thou I'm alright jack, my misses is a British citizen now, I've hung around here for a long time now trying to help people out.

but for some people its never been easy, myself included, trying to prove your relationship is genuine, that you can support your spouse without recourse to public funds and you have suitable accommodation that's not over crowded.

and for those who voted Tory at the last election, they were like turkeys voting for xmas

[Hundi]

and for those who voted Tory at the last election, they were like turkeys voting for xmas

well said, i dont think i have ever hated a politician so much in my life as i do Cameron. I wasnt old enough to really understand the Thatcher years but it wouldn't surprise me if that chump and his cronies are worse than her

[joebloggs]

well said, i dont think i have ever hated a politician so much in my life as i do Cameron. I wasnt old enough to really understand the Thatcher years but it wouldn't surprise me if that chump and his cronies are worse than her

labour wouldn't have brought in the £18k6 minimum, supposedly the tories wanted to put the figure to over £25k a year but the libs wouldn't support the gov unless they used the lower figure of £18k6.

the Tories brought in a nasty law in the past The Primary Purpose rule and its one of the first things labour scrapped.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/po...05/straw.shtml

[Hundi]

is there any chance if Labour got back in they would do a slimier thing do u think to the 18k law? i have heard they may not, just so they don't lose the votes from racist morons but id like to think they would. As much as i love this country there's a lot i dislike also.

anyway sorry to go off topic

[Arthur Little]

is there any chance if Labour got back in they would do a slimier thing do u think to the 18k law?

... not sure whether you mean slimier or similar in this context. But EITHER way, ... the answer is YES! And my reason for replying in the AFFIRMATIVE is simply because each of 's two MAIN political parties is as bad as the other. BOTH contain their UNfair share of slimy, self-seeking adherents. BOTH are equally capable of "doing the dirty" on the electorate they purport to represent. So ... with precious little to choose from between the two, they're ALSO very similar in that respect, tbh.

... now you know!

[Hundi]

... not sure whether you mean slimier or similar in this context. But EITHER way, ... the answer is YES! And my reason for replying in the AFFIRMATIVE is simply because each of 's two MAIN political parties is as bad as the other. BOTH contain their UNfair share of slimy, self-seeking adherents. BOTH are equally capable of "doing the dirty" on the electorate they purport to represent. So ... with precious little to choose from between the two, they're ALSO very similar in that respect, tbh.

... now you know!

Yes, sorry it was auto correct on my phone with the spelling. And yes, I know both are as bad, I don't trust them with a millimeter of my mind, body or soul. Just wondered if they had said there's a chance they will change it if they got in power.

I'm actually considering moving to the Phills, but it's gonna take a lot of consideration and I'm by no means rushing into it. I am currently trying to find a way to make money online; if anyone has any advice please contact me. I keep hearing about making money online without selling. I don't know if this is a myth. I have sold online for years but I don't really want to have stock if I was there, but I don't know.

[London_Manila]

labour wouldn't have brought in the £18k6 minimum, supposedly the tories wanted to put the figure to over £25k a year but the libs wouldn't support the gov unless they used the lower figure of £18k6.

the Tories brought in a nasty law in the past The Primary Purpose rule and its one of the first things labour scrapped.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/po...05/straw.shtml

£18600 may be ok in other parts of the uk but as for here in London its simply not enough

A sliding scale on where you actually live might be a better idea

Living in London i would put it at around £30k to comfortably support 2 people

[melovesengland]

Of coarse they affect me if you read my posts on the subject.?

@andy 222 that reply by me was not directed at you



It didnt affect me when we lodge my application that time BUT even if it the financial requirement was passed before I applied, it wont affect us. Luckily my husbands earnings is just a little bit over the said requirement so it wouldnt be any problem.

@melovesengland---then you are very fortunate--compared to the OP--myself--and no doubt many others,

a little bit of sympathy and understanding wouldnt come amiss---just bear in mind it all changed last july--and some of us are now caught in a trap beyond our control.

I am a taxpayer and to be honest ''18,600'' is just pretty average earnings for a couple

yes--sars NV--as you say--for a couple--but i can be a dream wage for a single person trying to sponsor his partner--as the OP is.

bigmac, i understand what you feel and we are not here to argue with this. i am just trying to point out that even you moan all day, nothing and nothing will ever change. that is the rules, we cant do anything about that. obviously, by how you explain yourself and opinion you have your own way on doing it. i aint against of anything, i dont care how you do it anyway illegal, legal, hard way or easy way i dont care. i am just trying to point that moaning wont change anything. its not productive!

and if i havent got sympathy to the members here, i wouldve not helped them out by my own experiences and knowledge.