the news at the time said the ship was in retreat, so it was not a threat, shot in the back i say, a war crimeOriginally Posted by les_taxi
Maybe we should have let them kill some of our men!
Too bloody right sink it
the news at the time said the ship was in retreat, so it was not a threat, shot in the back i say, a war crime
Maybe we should have let them kill some of our men!
Too bloody right sink it
How do you know that news is true?
Was a war situation-they were geared up for conflict,You would rather take a chance and let our men be attacked?
If I was armed and saw a gunman hold a kid at gunpoint and then he ran away I would definitely "take him out" who is to say he is not going to attack another day, Presumably you would let him off
she changed the rules so she could legally sink that ship without being accused of war crime,How do you know that news is true?
Was a war situation-they were geared up for conflict,You would rather take a chance and let our men be attacked?
If I was armed and saw a gunman hold a kid at gunpoint and then he ran away I would definitely "take him out" who is to say he is not going to attack another day, Presumably you would let him off
any other country with the exception of america would face fierce criticism by the west and be accused of crime of war, one rule for the west another rule for them,
Can you just clarify who started the conflict?
argentina ,who started it is not the answer to why she shot them in the back,but it does say something about the morals or lack of morals of the witch
So then let's say they were running away,what would you say then if they had survived and at some point killed British personnel?
This should be good
there was no reason for them to, they were in retreat, it was obvious the conflict was over,So then let's say they were running away,what would you say then if they had survived and at some point killed British personnel?
This should be good
the point is the west insist there are rules of war, anything out of those rules is classed as a war crime, but its ok maggie could do whatever she wanted
People go on about the cost of living,makes me laugh.
Food years ago seemed far dearer than it is now,We all used to have sunday roast,then cold meat and mash on a monday.
Me good ol mum would sometimes say "it's chicken next week" I would tell my mate and he would come round for what was seen as a luxury in those days.
Yes food was cheaper but my first wage was £10.00 a week
Most people could eat chicken everyday if they wanted now.
It's tough these days having,car or more than one,Sky tv,wine in the kitchen as graham says ,Ipads,pcs,ps3s etc We don't know were born these days.
We've seen the ship on the bottom in the last couple of years by the same guys that done the Titanic. The way it was lying was pointing away from Argentina. Maybe you also missed the bit that HMS Conqueror, our nuclear sub, was being depth charged at the time by the Belgrano's covering destroyers?
So we were at war, our sub was under attack, the troop ships had fully armed destroyers with it, and we now have picture proof from an independent source that the ship was moving away from Argentina. The Belgrano's last order, picked up by the signals-intercept unit ordered the ship to meet up with other Argentinian warships inside the Exclusion Zone.
Keith - Administrator
guess i'll retreat
Just take it as a lesson Imagine, we were invaded, they sent ships to destroy us, we got them firstguess i'll retreat
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
