Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Court of Appeal dismisses human rights challenge to Immigration Rule

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Trusted Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pangasinan
    Posts
    25,640
    Rep Power
    150
    It used to be $75,000 required in a savings account...but could be withdrawn at a later date. (For retirement visa).


  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Marikina City
    Posts
    26,786
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by grahamw48 View Post
    It used to be $75,000 required in a savings account...but could be withdrawn at a later date. (For retirement visa).
    There's quite a few different 'products' now Graham. They don't seem to be marketing them like they used to.

    The 'Classic' scheme for older pensioners (50+) requires $10,000 plus the pension incomes mentioned above.

    Actually quite a good deal for a single bloke.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Tories plan human rights challenge
    By les_taxi in forum Loose Talk, Chat and Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 17th July 2014, 12:10

Visitors found this page by searching for:

visa appeal financial req uk high court

test challenge result high court uk immigration financial requirement

court of appeal immigration

immigration rules financial requirements high court appeal

court of appeal dismisses human rights challenge to immigration rules video

uk high court immigration financial case uk

human rights uk visa appeal

SEO Blog

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Filipino Forum : Philippine Forum