looks like not many bothered to read the ANALYSIS OF MARRIAGE VISA
CONSULTATION RESPONSES JUNE 2008 that i mentioned the other day, when moaning about the pre-entry English requirement for spouses

in the document it also mentioned again about changing the minimum age from 18 to 21 for a spouse visa.

but also, more important to many filipina's on here, the possible idea of revocation of indefinite leave to remain

• Thirty-three out of 45 respondents supported the
revocation of Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR)
following abandonment of a spouse, but possibly
with a time limit after the marriage. Thirty-six out
of 46 respondents also supported revocation of
ILR following evidence of abuse of the marriage
route to gain settlement.

so you never know what bad things could happen, so having ILR maybe not be enough, all the more reason to apply for naturalization, if it doesn't work out btw you both , that you wouldn't have to leave and go back to the phils